Why was way/993062141 named "Country of Texas"?

Reverted improper tagging. access=no is not possible when the road hasn't even started construction. Please begin replying to questions and feedback in changesets!

changeset/187260208

Reverted due to incorrect reclassification.

changeset/187256952

Reverting changeset/187061158 and changeset/187060991. Changes were not needed & repairs dragged node.

changeset/187150776

I don't mean to alarm you, but your CoMaps app seems to have made 114 unique changesets in this one area alone without any edits besides the one you actually meant to add.

Looks good to me.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186612290

Changeset looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/186365119

Please check your OpenStreetMap inbox. I have left important feedback on your changesets.

Hello! The "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" imagery is very outdated is not recommended to map with, as the buildings you have added aren't there anymore.
Bing Maps Aerial, Esri World Imagery, and Mapbox Satellite are typically more up-to-date and should be used instead.
I have reverted your changes here.

I don't think County Road 213 extends into Texas Materials. Is there signage indicating as such?

Hello. I have concerns regarding your recent changesets. Many of them are questionable at best, and contain comments that is purely jargon.

I have reverted these changesets for the following reasons:
changeset/185903682 - An air conditioning unit is not Rainbet's mainframe
changeset/185903527 - Arbitrary natural tag
changeset/185863245 - A website is not a military zone
changeset/185578364 - Arbitrary addition of military landuse
changeset/185484223 - A hedge is not present on the freeway, let alone 41mi long
changeset/185483336 - Not a glacier, bad name
changeset/185480741 - A building does not cover the road
changeset/185480534 - There are no barriers here
changeset/185463429 - There are buildings here, however they do not span the mapped area
changeset/185431622 - Dubious residential area, I am certain it is not called "NDIII Safety Corridor"
changeset/185368529 - Unsourced claim

If you could, please stop making these dubious edits. OSM should not be used a personal playground.

Hello! The description you added to node/14022840068 is not allowed because it contains marketing. Please see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam.

I have went ahead and removed the tag for you.

Hello! It seems that you have added a description that is considered spam. I already went ahead and removed it. Please see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam for extra information.

Hello. Please refrain from adding advertising into the description of places. I will go ahead fix that & errors in the time formatting.

Hi, I have reverted this changeset for the following reasons:

1. The renaming was only done for the alternative name, in which the renaming is partially complete, but causes discrepancies.
2. Name of the road was correctly labeled according to addresses. (src: https://geohub.wilcotx.gov/datasets/WILCO::county-web-address-public/explore?location=30.631903%2C-97.689912%2C17.93)

changeset/171895000

Hi! It seems you have accidentally deleted an important tag on way/176832712, so I went ahead and fixed the error.

I'd personally recommend reviewing what you're submitting before sending it off, especially on smaller changesets.

Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I'd just like to inform you that Esri World Imagery has the most up-to-date data in the Williamson County area as of right now.

You can change the aerial imagery layer by pressing B (or clicking the layered icon on the right side) in the iD editor menu.

Edits partially reverted by changeset/165175635

While I am not saying that you are evading questions/comments intentionally, you seem to have a tendency of not responding to them.

There are 14 other changesets that have at least one comment on them, some of which being:
changeset/139918149 - Asks for sources, sees you deleting and recreating ways
changeset/131510629 - Comments on making sure you add proper sources
changeset/144793256 - Was reverted due to the roads not being open yet, along with 35 ignored iD editor warnings
changeset/154447260 - Was reverted similar to c144793256, with 23 ignored iD warnings.
changeset/107987780 - This changeset was advised that it caused an issue with a relation
A full list of comments on changesets you made can be found at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6802016

You have acknowledged and/or responded to none of these and have continued to make errors that the iD editor and contributors were attempting to alert you of.

I don't know if you don't receive messages from OSM via email, or if you know this feature even exists. I have attempted to get in contact with you directly through OSM's own platform, yet you are still yet to respond 72+ hours later.

I'm not trying to discourage you from mapping on OSM, it's a service you are aiding by updating things! However I find your edits to be low quality, not properly reviewed, and not sourced well. Even basic sources such as "Survey" or "Aerial Imagery" could negate some the comments, yet you appear to not being doing any of such to try and improve.

I have just sent a PM to the original editor through OSM.