mcliquid's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 144604513 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144587008 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144583737 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 137636201 | Baustelle aufgehoben: changeset/144566435 |
|
| 144558868 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144558251 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144556260 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144556259 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144555474 | Hi, der Weg wurde erst im August 2023 als unbenutzbar gemeldet. Ist er nun wieder Instand gesetzt? |
|
| 144551198 | Hi, sollte man dann brand und operator nicht der vollständig mit entfernen? Und ich denke der Name mit "Ehemalig" ist jetzt obsolete, dann einfach alles was mit Rotem Kreuz zu tun hat entfernen, die Historie ist ja in der Datenbank, für die die es interessiert. Was denkst du? |
|
| 144453415 | Thanks, already fixed! |
|
| 144539128 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144523792 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 137636201 | Hi, sind die acht Wochen nicht schon vorüber? |
|
| 144510973 | Couldn't you have edited the Carglass on the other side of the world in a different changeset? Only because of the size of the changeset and the unnecessary noise ;) |
|
| 144448494 | Hi, you have removed the "building=school" completly in your changeset, I've readded it now.
|
|
| 144448494 | Hi, you have removed the building-tag - why? |
|
| 144456202 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |
|
| 144453969 | I've added "opening_hours=Mo-Su,PH off" so it's displayed as closed all the time. Alternative would be to add the lifecycle prefix "demolished:" befire "amenity=restaurant" - depends how long they will close? Lifecycle Prefixes are super valuable, worth to read it: osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix |
|
| 144409080 | Hi, just a general recommendation: changesets should be local. To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to: • combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province) • keep changes within the same country • upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area Why? Have a look at the section
Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping! |