Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, nur ein kleiner Hinweis zu diesem Quest, der mir früher auch unterlaufen ist. Bei dem Quest geht es um die rechtliche Nutzbarkeit von Straßen für Fußgänger. In der Schweiz muss dieses mit der Bildtafel "2.15 Verbot für Fussgänger" ausgeschildert sein.
Siehe: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:CH-Vorschriftssignal-Verbot_f%C3%BCr_Fussg%C3%A4nger.svg

Man muss hier unterscheiden zwischen "Ist es möglich?" und "Ist es verboten?". Der Quest möchte letzteres wissen und dafür braucht es ein Verbotsschild.

Du musst noch ein bisschen weiterlesen. Die Headline lautet "Execute with caution": osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Execute_with_caution

"Execute only a small number of edits with a new bot at beginning before proceeding with larger edits."

May I ask, is it really warranted? And isn't it clearly a mechanical edit and doesn't it have to comply with the Automated Edits code of conduct? Does it do that? If so, where is the Community Communication? Where is the wiki page? Where is the log?

osm.wiki/Mechanical_Edits

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, da du einen Review angefordert hast, gehe ich kurz darauf ein. Mit "traffic_sign" gibt man normalerweise nur an, auf welcher Basis ein bestimmtes Tagging durchgeführt wurde - also beispielsweise warum ein Radweg als Radweg eingetragen wurde.
Um das Stoppschild für das Routing als "Zeitstrafe" gültig zu machen, braucht es ein "highway" als Key - also highway=stop. Optional könnte man einen Punkt mit "traffic_sign=stop" neben der Straße dort platzieren wo das Schild wirklich steht, aber das würde niemand auswerten.

Die Richtung gibt man auf einem Weg idealerweise nur mit "direction=forward/backward" an, da sich dies am einfachsten auslesen lässt. Eine Gradzahl wird momentan nicht ausgewertet.

Das finale (aus meiner Sicht korrekte) Tagging wäre damit: direction=backward + highway=stop

Hallo Wolfgang, ich hatte ehrlicherweise nur die Startseite studiert und musste bei den Schrauben und Nägeln an "hardware" denken, aber du hast recht, dein Vorschlag passt hier definitiv besser! Soll ich es machen oder magst du?

Because the "building" itself is untouched, only the nodes of the building are moved.

Hi guys, that's the wrong changeset you're discussing.
This changeset was created February 10, 2023. When you go back in time to the 9th Feb 2023 the building is already wrong: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DKo

You can go back to Nov 02, 2022 till the building is correct: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DKp

That means the building geometry was "destroyed" on this date. When you search for changesets on this date in this area you will find this one: changeset/128381950

To prove this, check the geometry changes in OsmCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128381950/

Cheers

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Hi, man kann darüber diskutieren, ob es Straßenlaternen wirklich in den Daten benötigt, aber einfach löschen?
node/11064389667/history

Hi,

just a general recommendation: changesets should be local.

To avoid conflicts and as a courtesy to reviewers, it is recommended to:

• combine changes in a small geographical area (within a city, district or province)

• keep changes within the same country

• upload/save changes before moving on to map in a different area

Why? Have a look at the section
"Geographical size of changesets" on this wiki page:
osm.wiki/Changeset

Thanks for considering, have a nice day and happy mapping!

Wird der Ortsname in CAPSLOCK geschrieben?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144256771

Hi, danke für den Edit. Da sind nur leider noch so viele Objekte mit falscher Adresse, welche alle von (mittlerweile) gelöschten Usern entstammen.
Siehe: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1DFX

Deshalb sollte man die Datenherkunft und Korrektheit vermutlich generell hinterfragen. Was denkst du?