Hi - there's quite an odd copy-paste error in these two nodes!

node/6844935727

node/6844935728

I at first thought it might be spam until I recognised your user ID.

Oops, I should have noticed that the number didn't come from you originally - thanks

Output of "2.0" should be perhaps "2.0 MW"? - On way/404294617

Hi - thanks for doing this. I noticed one error, so just to let you know:
You've tagged the solar farm with plant:output:electricity=* which is not normal, the asterisk should usually be replaced by either the actual capacity (such as "3 MW") or just "yes". I'll update that tag

No. 91 of them are "not seen" or "unsure"

Hi - I'm checking through some solar farms. Thanks for mapping lots, by the way! For this one at Southend, REPD says the capacity of this one is 2.5 MW. Do you know where you got the number of 3 MW from, please?

Online news also says 2.5 MW: https://www.emexlondon.com/london-southend-airports-solar-farm-to-offset-20-percents-of-its-energy-use/

Hi - do you have any idea where the capacity of "3.6 MW" was sourced from, please? I'm checking through solar farms.

In the REPD database, it's listed as 2.5 MW. In some random news article, I found a mention of 3.6 MW https://harworthgroup.com/2016/02/04/harworth-powers-on-with-major-renewable-energy-expansion/
So I'm not clear on what the correct value to tag should be.

REPD says 3.1 MW for this one. Did you get 3.8 MW from another source?

(I should specify - I'm referring to Way: Carlton Farm (474390249))

Thanks for your careful effort. However I don't think this is mistaken tagging. It fits correctly with the method we've been using in the UK, and which is documented on the wiki - see the "Solar Park/Solar Farm" section here: generator:source=solar - I'll set these tags back to the system we're using in the UK.

Typo "eas" in node/6863145810.

By the way if you use "E" or "SSW" etc, that might be more robust against typos.

Thanks for mapping some PV!

(I mean Shepreth)

I think they may be REPD entries 5165, 5287, and 5554. I'll tag them as such, for now at least

Do you feel confident these three sets are all part of one plant? On the aerial imagery, they look like three different sets - different colour/visual style implying different installs - and maybe they're connected (one an extension of another?) but I don't know

A presumed typo in node/6685472039: generator:output:electricity="Xu Zhang". I'll change it to "yes"

OK great. Thanks!

Hi - are you confident that this solar farm you've mapped as "Hadley" repd 1990 is indeed the right one? To me it looks quite likely to be "Twemlows" repd 4861, which has the right location and is described as "land on runway at Twemlows"

Hi - you've mapped this solar farm as 7.7 MWp. All the sources I can see give it as 10 or 10.2 MWp. I'll update this item - but if you have other data sources please do comment.

Some of these, e.g. Raventhorpe 352173386, could do with re-tagging as power=plant with PV areas contained within

Thanks, fixed