Thanks for highlighting, I pasted the values from the OSM wiki as I can never remember the syntax, but I accidentally kept the whole string in the key. The Mo-Fr 16:45; Sa 10:30 value is correct as surveyed. I've fixed the key.

Hi guinius,
Thanks for adding the footpaths. There are a few things in this changeset that look a bit odd, can you check them please?
- way/620497503 isn't a single building, which is normally what building=house denotes. Last time I passed by College Grove at the start of June is was still under construction, however if it has now finished then landuse=residential would be a better tag to use here.
- You moved the Itchingfield/Southwater boundary (222541882) but OS Boundary-Line still matches the previous placement. Has the boundary actually moved?
- You've used bridge=boardwalk for railway crossings 821860956 and 821860963. I think I can see what you were going for here, but the boardwalk tag is usually used to map a structure on stilts over water, wetlands, or rough terrain.

Hi again,

Please don't change maxpeed values from mph to kph like this. The former maxpeed of 40 mph is what is evident on the ground. 64 kph isn't the same thing.

What program is "ATSR Edit Map"? If you are testing out a new editor then it would be better to use the dev APIs located at https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Hi,

Your changes to the A24 are a little odd. You've changed the maxpeed from 50 mph (which was accurate) to 80 (defaulting to KPH, which is not accurate). Also, the name of the road is not "Dorking Road_1".

What program is "ATSR Edit Map"? If you are testing out a new editor then it would be better to use the dev APIs located at https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Hi AMWS,

Thanks for updating the new section of bridleway. I've surveyed it a few times now but I can't see any evidence of ways 798009790 or 798009791. What was your source for these new ways?

It's not entirely clear on the ground where the bridleway stops and the footpath starts. There's a bridleway fingerpost at the Mill Lane end and a footpath fingerpost at Christ's Hospital. If and when it's clearer it would be good to update the designation, I'll keep it in mind to do this as well.

User has confirmed that changes come from a direct survey.

Hi PB&C and welcome to Openstreetmap!
Thanks for the edits, unfortunately your re-routing the Downslink back to its original position caused a few issues with way/24293643 but I've tidied it up in changeset/82437616
You mention in the changeset comment that the edits are based on conveyancing plans. Can you confirm that you've had explicit permission to use these plans as a source?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82430119

Thanks, I've changed the highway tag in changeset/79532771.
Has HDC given permission to use the planning applications in this way?

Hi Thomas, do you have a link to the planning documents? I'd be interested in seeing the details. There's no evidence on the ground yet of the roads, perhaps these should be tagged as highway=proposed for now?

Hi Martin, I don't suppose you remember why the designation=public_footpath was removed from ways 34849366 and 508192752? The public footpath sign at the corner of Hills Farm Lane and Guildford Road is still up, pointing to the path.

Hi Sinh, I drove past today and the pub has definitely been closed for a while. I've updated the pub and car park in changeset/72573823.

Hi Phill,
I passed by this area today, did you mean to delete way/679195994? It still exists on the ground so should stay on the map. Also the Downs Link is still being routed further to the south, is the current position where it will go when construction is finished?
Thanks, Matt

Hi Dan, careful when adding possessive apostrophes - it's Piries Place on the ground, not Pirie's.

Thanks for replying so quickly. The dictionary definition is a little misleading with regards to OSM data and sounds to me like it's describing a frontage road:osm.wiki/Frontage_road

The commonly accepted definition of a service road in OpenStreetMap can be found here: highway=service

Hi Jake, highway=service doesn't prohibit public access to the estate by itself (that's what access=* tags are for). This road is a dead end only used to access the businesses, so highway=service seems appropriate to me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62810109

Done, thanks. :)

Hi Dave, I'm not sure about the name 'muddy cut through' for way/85621725. That's more of a description (albeit an accurate one!)

Is it a local name for the path? If so then loc_name would be more appropriate.

Thanks for looking, yes I tagged this with a review_requested for a couple of reasons. Firstly I was doing it from memory (although I just noticed I put source=survey, oops) and couldn't remember the exact geometry of Dunelm and TK Maxx (I happened to have the chance to survey it a couple of days later and made some corrections in changeset/57847906). More importantly it's the first time I've tagged using the level schema so thought I'd flag it just in case I'd misunderstood how it was intended to work.

No problem, I don't usually have the time to do a full survey but I'm filling in details and updating features from memory when I notice them. :)

Hi Phill, thanks again for the continued updates. Just a tip with the construction area in this changeset - it's a good general rule of thumb to avoid linking areas and ways together like you have done here: osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes

Practically, it makes it harder to edit if the construction area changes in the future (likely!). Also the way is often drawn along the centreline of the road. I've made some changes to this area in changeset/56646994