Changeset When Comment
56520892

Hi Phill, thanks for your recent edits. Just to let you know that you joined way/562741029 to part of the North Horsham admin boundary (way/222020434) instead of Redkiln Way. I've fixed this in changeset/56535280.

56219200

Thinking about it, opening_hours would probably be better.

56219200

Hi Dave, is the ice rink now back to being a volleyball court? If the ice rink is only open for a limited time each year it would be better to use a seasonal=* tag (or something similar)

56197374

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Does this lake really exist?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56197374

55668073

You only have to make the changes once - the different zoom levels render at different times. The full technical explanation is pretty long and I'm no expert on it, so I won't be able to help ;-) but the changes will show up eventually. It's unlikely to take more than a few days.

55668073

Nice, thanks!

55654375

Hi belugabob, and welcome to Openstreetmap! Your edit looks good to me, thanks for updating the map with the new layout.

The only improvement I'd make is that you have split the cycleway up into three parts for what seems to be no reason (I'm happy to be corrected!) - ways 235219134; 554875249 and 554875250. If there's no difference in tagging between them then it's generally neater to keep ways in one section.

55427183

No response so I've undeleted them in changeset/55548041.

55353492

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55353492

55353492

Thanks pcbbc, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

55427183

Hi Dan, did you mean to remove ways 540057208 and 540057209? They were mapped recently by michaelinredhill so I would be surprised if the waterways didn't exist any more.

54249720

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetmap!

55269266

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55269266

54677962

Hi Davezilla, and welcome to Openstreetmap.

Thanks for your edits to Horsham. Just letting you know that I've undeleted node/558647746 as it had address information which I would assume is still correct - let me know if that's not the case. I've marked the restaurant (Sanmae) as disused.

54346979

No response so the residential area has been undeleted in changeset/54442530.

54406368

Hi Mike,

I've carried out a bit more work on these three buildings (changeset/54415729 if you want to check)
- Added smoking=yes to way/544250782 from the node that was deleted in this changeset.
- Merged the Andrew Lyons node into way/544250762.
- changed ways 544250762 and 70007760 to building=retail.

54346979

Hi, did you mean to delete the residential way/22814436 around Horley?

52085623

Hi İbrahim Yurdakul ,

Thanks for adding this information to the map. You've added the CAA node twice - I guess this may be a maps.me issue? Also you could add the information directly to the building (way/23687379) rather than creating additional nodes.

Matt

14643082

Sorry, not to the west. I meant to the east. I knew I'd fall foul of Muphry's Law.

14643082

Hi,
Also, way/41527779 has source:designarion. Is this also a typo?

I changed a few ways with this tag to source:designation in changeset/51557361 but will hold off doing anything further for the moment as there are a lot of ways with source:designarion to the west of here.