matt_ellery's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 51275939 | Thanks, I've added a fixme and will re-survey when I next pass by. |
|
| 51211668 | Hello Dave, thank you for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Regarding the bus stop (node/5041516821) - there is an existing bus stop just to the south on the northbound side of Bury Road. Is there more than one bus stop going north? If not I'd suggest editing the existing node rather than creating a duplicate. |
|
| 39330672 | Hi Rikki, do the footpaths follow the path of the service roads mapped in this changeset or are they actually separate? |
|
| 51081216 | Hi Dan, thanks for updating these shops. Do you have any idea what will be replacing the cafe? It may be worthwhile keeping the node but removing the cafe and name tags as currently there is useful address information that will be lost. |
|
| 50807316 | To answer your fixme question on way way/267484437 - good spot, you're right. This isn't and has never to my knowledge been a cycleway. I'll change it back to a footway. |
|
| 50439675 | Hi Jake's Cars, I'm reverting this change too as it was tagged correctly before. Only the very end is surfaced in asphalt, the majority is surfaced in paving stones (well, I call them bricks, but I'm following the wiki). There are photos of the road on Mapillary to confirm. |
|
| 50439655 | Hi, I'm reverting this change back to highway=construction. The three roads are still under construction, therefore they shouldn't be tagged as highway=residential yet. |
|
| 49883508 | Hi Rafal, is way/91748591 really farmland? If the area is used for allotments then the previous tag of landuse=allotments would be better. |
|
| 22560259 | Hi Stephen, Google Street View is not a valid resource as it is not made available under an open license. Having said that, your note isn't factually inaccurate. I'm removing the note and putting a not:name tag on the way instead. |
|
| 33837975 | Hi Dan, I first want to say that I'm impressed by the amount of work you've done around the Horsham area over the last few years. Apologies for commenting on an old changeset but I have noticed that you have occasionally used the "name" tag to contain details that really should be in separate tags - for example the Pavilions in the Park doesn't need "(Leisure Centre)" after it as this is already handled by the tag leisure=sports_centre. Name should only include what the object is called: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only |