I agree Jarv, Kilnwood Lane falls short of being an unclassified highway. This changeset should be reverted.

@Laura21! if you need help reverting this change then let me know.

All the best,
Matt

I checked way/662637905 this afternoon. It's a private track/driveway, so unclassified is absolutely not correct.
All the best,
Matt

Hi Graham, the Aldi building is there, there's no need for the layer tags. If you do a full refresh of your browser's cache (Ctrl+F5/Shift+F5/Ctrl+Shift+R) then you should see it.

Hi mygrove, you asked for a review. What are you trying to achieve with the layer tag here?

The Aldi building way/1311800070 looks OK, but you should change building=yes to building=construction (and I suggest then adding construction=supermarket ). This is much preferred to using '(under construction)' in the name - see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

All the best, Matt

Yeah, it's not changed. Reverted in changeset/151823387

I'm 99% sure that the Bing Street side image hasn't materially changed and I can see no reason why it would have done so. The BUSES ONLY paint on the road is also on the Bing aerial images. I can check tomorrow to make certain.

Hi, you requested a review for this change. It looks good to me, well spotted!
All the best,
Matt

Changes made in changeset/150661818

I'll try to check the A264 east of Rusper Road too.

I think this whole section and the Rusper Road roundabout need a proper review, maxpeeds are all over the place - some holdovers from construction, some that I suspect are just plain wrong. I'll see what I can do over the next week.

Westbound is NSL dual here (surveyed today). I'll try to confirm one way or the other eastbound.

Not a problem Mark, and welcome to OSM! I've made my suggested edits to the pillbox tags in changeset/149796231.

Hi M4rkle, thanks for your recent edits in this area. Just a couple of thoughts about way/323111404

You don't need to add building=bunker because there's already abandoned:building=bunker. This uses the lifecycle prefix (osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) to indicate that the bunker isn't currently in use.

I clearly had a brain fart with bunker_type=gun_emplacement, would you agree that bunker_type=pillbox is more appropriate?

All the best,
Matt

A conversation at changeset/89790560 highlighted that some localities were being used for the purpose of showing bridge names on the standard map. This CS moves the information to the bridge with an appropriate tag.

No problem, I've reverted in changeset/147034289

Hi Dan, you have split way/1041817380 into two and combined both parts into a multipolygon. What was your intention with this changeset?

True, but just to check: the name for 387215767 has been tagged "Welcross" but the Grange is definitely "Wellcross". Is there a reason for the different name, or is the airstrip a typo?

Hi Martin, relation/4510978 is a residential building for students at Christ's Hospital school. I don't think building=house is an improvement on what was there before.

Sidewalk=yes removed in changeset/141839125

Hi Yavotch,

Did you mean to tag way/613856695 with sidewalk=yes?

Thanks Dan. Unfortunately, putting localities in OSM just to render the name on the standard map is marked as inappropriate on the wiki, as it's a clear case of tagging for the renderer: place=locality

For example, the "Useful Maps" render does show the bridge's name, making the locality obsolete. https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#21/51.06113/-0.33521/H

It's best to think of OSM as a database first. There are hundreds of methods to view the information contained within, and the Standard map is just one of those views.

I've created an overpass query that shows all the localities that you have added with "Bridge" in the name that are near a named bridge . Can you review these and remove any localities that aren't needed?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1yQd

Thanks,
Matt