Hi Dan,

I'm not sure what value there is in adding a bunch of localities for bridges, doubly so considering that most already have a bridge with the same name in the vicinity. Can you remember why you added these?

All the best, Matt.

Hi UtterClutter,

It looks like something's gone wrong with this changeset, as the same note has been added to all houses. Also, is the note really relevant information to be added to OSM?

All the best,
Matt

No worries, happy cycling! :)

Hi Trevor, and welcome to OSM!

The Hornbrook Inn is already mapped (way/60582413). What were you trying to add with your edit?

I've removed the tags as they are duplicating data.

Matt

Hi Matt,

La Piazetta has already been mapped. node/500015826

I've removed the duplicate node and added your tags to the original one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126564961

Hi PeterMapit,
I think node/9577581011 has a typo in the name - should it be Honeywell?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118466636

Hi Martin,
I passed by this area today and now I'm afraid I'm even less convinced by your assertion. There's shared cycle/footway signs on each end of the bridge that have not changed since before the road was closed off to motor traffic and clearly (to my mind) route along the deleted ways. One *could* use sidewalk:left:bicycle=yes for way/180730791, but not on way/431216816 as there is a grass verge in between. Therefore I think it's clearer and closer to reality to have the separate ways as they were before. I'll revert the deletion.
All the best,
Matt

Hi Martin,
Thanks for clarifying, although I don't 100% agree. There has been a signed cycleway across the bridge next to the road since before it was closed to general traffic. When the road was closed this didn't change (the sign is still there), and they even put a grass verge in between the pavement and the road up to the bridge on the eastern side, making it more separate than it was before the closure.

No worries about the tree, I've reinstated it.

Hi Martin, I'm wondering why you removed the shared cycleway (ways 681997657 and 830139646)? Also curious why you removed the tree (node/4856064270) as it's also still there.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115957729

Reverted in changeset/111788075.

@SK53 no, I tried an failed to find anything when the footpath signs were removed. I have re-surveyed today (see also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Downs_Link_fingerpost.jpg) and updated the bridleway tags in changeset/111767131.

Thanks for the research & revert work Jerry.

The way from Railway Cottages under the Arun Valley line was recently converted from a footpath to a bridleway as part of the work to extend the offroad section of the Downs Link (see v5 of way/412925868/history - a bridleway fingerpost has been installed since then).

Hi mygrove, thanks for your edits. Adding access=no to a way is only used if the general public are explicitly prohibited, so it's definitely not appropriate for this public bridleway. What were you trying to clarify re: the access?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111666933

hi talkytoaster,
Unfortunately this change has removed a section from the Riverside Walk relation relation/3085395
Please can you revert (as it is valid and accepted practice to create pavements as separate ways osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way ) or add the relevant sections of Lemmington Way, Rusper Road, and the roundabout to the RW relation with the correct sidewalk tags.

Hi jaabhil,
Just letting you know that your edits are deleting existing nodes close to the newly mapped ways for seemingly no reason. I've restored the nodes deleted in Horsham this morning.
Thanks,
Matt

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your recent updates to Horsham and Wickhurst Green. Just a note to say that it's good practice to keep & enhance existing elements rather than deleting and replacing them: osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

All the best,
Matt

You beat me to it, I noticed the work had moved on when I was in the area yesterday but I didn't have time to survey it properly. Nice work!

Thanks Jack,
I've put Eversfield House as an alt_name and added a note to help discourage others from reverting your changes in the future.
Matt

Hi jdhaywd,
Thanks for your edit and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've made a small change to the car parks as they were overlapping with the adjacent buildings.
I'm interested in the name change from Eversfield House to Tilney House. There are signs outside the building that seem to suggest it's Eversfield - is this an outdated name for the building, or do the signs point to a different building?
Thanks,
Matt