Please don't make changesets the size of the entire world, its far far too big.

re: Park Street Mini Park

I walk past this park quite often when going to the shops and the bulk of the park is between Bedford and Coghlan, not Bedford and Olive.

The website seems to reflect this: it indicates that a playground is at this park and features it in its image. The playground is only on the side between Coghlan and Bedford, not Olive. So at the very least that side is part of the park.

I'm not sure what the correct solution is here, maybe combining both sides in a multipolygon? Its possible that the wording on the website is erroneous, but the land on the side of Bedford/Olive is relatively "park like" enough (nice grass and a shaded bench) that its probably considered a part of Park Street Mini Park.

Semicolon separated `ref=` is the correct way to tag platforms that are physically the same platform that are "logically" separated by the transit authority (e.g. by having one side be one 6 and another platform be platform 7). Perth train station has been tagged this way for almost 10 years.

changeset/178617930

Per the wiki on man_made=bridge I've added the bridge tags back to the ways :)

Was removing the bridge tags from the bridges themselves intentional? it seems to have created some issues with the paths that run under them. See https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/8f4a58cb-6a46-f1f3-4d43-62a6da848a6f and https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issue/4cdb755c-310c-f72a-3228-9406a325cfb0 for example

If these are corridors inside a building I think a better tag would be `highway=corridor`
`indoor=yes`? At least thats what I can glean from the wiki :)

Is "Hair Salon" the actual name of the hairdresser?

thanks!

both 960 bus routes should be added to a route_master superrelation (osm.wiki/Relation:route_master) 🙂

Consistency mostly, from what I've seen most rooftop solar panels are mapped as points (at least in Perth).