kingkingHK's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 184498501 | MOS Road <-> Tai Po Road (and hence Shing Mun and Tsing Sha) deserves `=tertiary` at least imo. This is the only way without any traffic lights, at least until T4 opens, so it should be somewhat competitive. |
|
| 184498501 | Why? Shouldn't the higher one be used? |
|
| 184353499 | At least, it's what Kovoschiz told me: changeset/180237869 |
|
| 134628578 | Is it really appropriate to use `landuse=cemetery` for columbaria? |
|
| 184098138 | Informal alternative routes exist. There's many discussion about it on the OSM World Discord. Iirc the conclusion is that it just can't be handled with normal PT relations. But imo this doesn't mean we can't map the stops. Recall previous discussion about bus stop names: "Just because the government doesn't explicitly say it exist, doesn't mean it doesn't exist!" |
|
| 184056483 | Well first grass has nothing to do with this. And then, pictures of heaths on the wiki look nothing like any typical Hong Kong roadside plantations. |
|
| 184057666 | Creating non-existent physical separation is wrong though. It's not just not good enough. "Simple stuff" doesn't mean you can be as lazy as you want to. |
|
| 184412298 | Please note that Youtube cannot be used as a source for OSM |
|
| 184372975 | Your link points to a community centre of some sort that is equipped with a drinking water, not a drinking water named "地海深居(土木工程處社區聯絡中心)" |
|
| 184372975 | Is it really a drinking water? |
|
| 184353499 | Hi there, to denote urban vs NT taxi stands, simply use `taxi=private` + `taxi:HK:Urban=yes` or `taxi:HK:NT=yes`. Hope this helps! |
|
| 184304706 | Who has ever said that `barrier=gate` implies `foot=no`? And are you sure bicycles are allowed? |
|
| 183707794 | ||
| 183632535 | ||
| 183592620 | ||
| 180536189 | @vectorial8192 When I went there last December, I do recall seeing a dirt path roughly following the geometry of the quoted way. But I didn't walk all the way down to Beacon Hill Road, so I can't confirm the lower section. |
|
| 183295290 | ||
| 180408581 | I will take that as a yes. See changeset/184303393 |
|
| 159724504 | Why did you make the entire runway `runway=displaced_threshold`? |
|
| 161807930 | Why did you delete a seamark and a survey point? |