katpatuka's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 37252742 | no idea where the z= came from ;) I don't have better sources than you had anyway... |
|
| 70555834 | I've now changed man_made=ground_text -> geoglyph with text:translation:en in China |
|
| 70555834 | The geoglyph is on a dam and shows the name of the reservoir. Since there is apparently still no agreement on key combinations describing the details of a geoglyph (see man_made=geoglyph) I usually use text=* and text:meaning= inscription sounds a bit strange for huge characters on the ground... ;) Occurances of text= key created in Turkey: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JlD You also still find an early key man_made=ground_text there... |
|
| 70019754 | o-oh... :) Well spotted! That was a copy/paste error - the Sumi Fortress is just nearby at way/688601382 |
|
| 69369933 | I can only guess we both changed the China relation (splitting ways maybe) because I didn't touch relation/449220. I'm busy in Jilin - not at the coast of China ;) |
|
| 68752837 | Thank you! I thought I'd downloaded all referrers (parent relations) before splitting - may be I've split before downloading ;) |
|
| 3024712 | hm - CS closed over 9 years ago... ;) The region probably has seen some development in the meantime but I'm not up-to-date nor have any reference maps at hand. But looking at the road condition I'd nowadays tag the unclassified part at least as tertiary or maybe secondary. |
|
| 64197969 | Ok ok, FreedSky told me already some weeks ago... ;) |
|
| 3834628 | Thanks for asking ;) Well - it's a gps track from 2010 I found somewhere; I guess there wasn't any imagery available at that time to cross-check the type of track. Looking at it now I'd also say the western part of the road is residential while the eastern part more looks like a highway=track - feel free to change tagging around there. |
|
| 63426263 | Mich ärgern ja diese 1000-node zählenden 455 km langen überlandleitungen wie way/330401062#map=7/46.719/120.404 gewaltig! Wenn dafür schon relationen erstellt werden (warum eigentlch zwei? relation/8121497 und 3400068), dann kann man doch auch die 1000 nodes in wenigstens 10*100 aufsplitten, oder nicht ?! Und dann gibt es noch way/560547244 und wahrscheinlich mehrere andere von user Meppen7, der sich mit way/330401062 überschneidet... (seufz) |
|
| 16795660 | Well as I wrote in the changeset's source it is was a gps track from wikiloc.com converted 6 years ago. At that time there wasn't much around with imagery to cross-check the kind of track I estimate. Someone must have joined the single parts of the track since I use to split long ways into chunks of around 100 ±20.nodes |
|
| 27888128 | Are you sure way/320211855 is 阿拉善左旗巴彦浩特机场? way/317216080 looks much more like an airport |
|
| 60101240 | Halen inanamıyorum! Manyaklar! Oralarda nasıl bir rüzgar esebilir... ;) |
|
| 60101240 | Nesim kuzuuum! :) Dağın tepesinde bir havaalanı yapılacak hiç aklım almaz benim! Bu plan nereden çıkıyor? Cyclemap katmanda baktın mı hiç? |
|
| 65182652 | Interesting! I've added that info as note as well. |
|
| 65182652 | Thank you very much :D I've added the Google Translate version for people not capable of reading Russian ;) |
|
| 65182652 | Ok. Didn't know that one uses Russian for name tag in Kazakhstan. Please add that information then on osm.wiki/WikiProject_Kazakhstan so that other mappers learn about this naming theme. |
|
| 44916207 | I can remove the cinema tag for you. Are the name tags like X/S1012 of any use? Was it only in Qinghai or other province too? |
|
| 44916207 | Hi, I see there are many nodes on a railway line which are tagged as "cinema 電影院" - did you mean a sort of "camera", maybe for surveillance ? |
|
| 64809412 | just silently fix my naming errors ;) - mainly occuring with county seats I estimate... |