What is written on a city limit street sign in Tibet? Only Chinese? If a county like Zêkog has more than 95% Tibetan speaking population I'd really expect multilingual signing. But I've never been in China so I might be wrong. Anyway: this needs then to get documented under osm.wiki/Multilingual_names#China

What about multilingual name tagging convention ?

For zh:曲库乎乡 I use

name=曲库乎乡 ཆུ་ཁོག་
name:zh=曲库乎乡
alt_name=多哇;曲库乎;Duowa;Dowa;Qukuhu;ཆུ་ཁོག
name:bo=ཆུ་ཁོག་
name:en=Chukhok
name:zh_pinyin=qūkùhū xiāng
official_name=曲库乎乡

The only thing left to do is then something like:

For all 乡 镇 in names of place=town nodes of provinces touched by katpatuka:

if name does not include space character then replace all name:zh with name in China

;)

Do you want to say: include the 县 乡 镇 at the end of names of counties, towns and townships in the name tag AND in name:zh tag ? Up to now I've used 县 乡 镇 with name tag but in name:zh without 县 乡 镇. On nodes for cities I also removed the 市 on name tags.

ok ;) I don't know why I could have tagged it that way - I've never been there anyway so feel free to correct all errors I might have made in that region.

changeset/64960249 reverted - please cross-check

Since I can't speak Chinese I do not use or check the name tag for ways in China. I guess I must have retraced a way propagating the name set before by someone else.

Some renderers may use this feature... in #osm chat someone said most US counties have admin_centre and label...

Well, this is beyond my scope of interest and should rather be discussed under osm.wiki/Talk:Relation:boundary#Label_role or a mailinglist. ;)

yes, they are optional but I find them useful. I'd changed the label to place=region for testing and that seems to have worked.

well, roles are explained under osm.wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members

In the moment I'm a bit confused too... Huanggang City relation/3144169
does not render label but Xianning City relation/3106518 does - both are admin_level=5... :o I'll have a closer look into this tomorrow and if I do not find a solution I'll ask in #osm chat channel.

Thanks Pikse for notifying me ;)

244082127 is the city centre with role of admin_centre; 5907547712 is for the label... some users tend to label the townhall with admin_centre but then one would need to know where the townhall exactly is... :/

The latter two are indead duplicates which I hadn't noticed being dupl. - on the other side the location is unclear: baidu and zh.wiki with wikidata put the town near node/2398361215 while the most 'official' site http://map.tianditu.gov.cn/ puts the town near node/5907547710. If you know more feel free to correct this ;)

no problem ;) I've added the two names back.
BTW: did you see that there is new Post Event DigitalGlobe imagery available on https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/119.90478515625,-0.8672001642909989,11?_k=x4gzkl ?

Hi Adhitya - please do not delete the most used "name" tags - for example of Palu and Sulawesi...

Hi ff5722

There's an untagged and unfinished (ring_not_closed) relation relation/7530001 in Guangxi - one of its ways way/475043829 is 99% made by you - do you know more about what the relation is supposed to be used for ? Forest maybe ?

Is the Tibetan name of Obo/Ebao/峨堡镇 མཁར་དམར ?

The S202 is member of [relation/8012371](https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8012371) which has G561 as ref - so I guess there went something wrong?
;)

Opet şirekti için çalıştın mı? Opet benzin istasyonlarının datası ile alaklı bir email varsa o zaman OSM viki'de belgelemek lazım. (Örnek: osm.wiki/Katpatuka/CDC_email_traffic )

Çavuşağa eski adı Barsama geri almış mı? Vikipedi'de halen Çavuşağa yazıyor fakat sen Barsama Mahallesi olarak kaydettin...

Sınırları bozuldu mu?