Käisime selle raja läbi 6. märtsil 2021 aastal ja salvestasin ka gps träki. Tähised polnud just kõige värskemad, aga rada oli ilusti läbitav. Kustutada ainult mingi kaudse info põhjal pole väga korrektne.

If you look at waymarkedtrails in Estonia, you see that I have put there almost all official hiking routes which exist in Estonia (except far south) Where do you see noise? I'm looking on every 'nice routers' you suggest and I can't find any new routes where to go at weekends, so for me those unverified, unofficial routes from other hikers in OSM are very welcomed.
You sound here like government officials whos only purpose is to follow rules, forgetting that OSM was made by community to serve needs of community. If you need official, all points verified map, you can take Maaameti maps. They are way more detailed and accurate. Or are you building competitor to official maps, why we need this?

I can't understand your point. Why can't I put here nice route for others to follow? We can have different views about OSM purpose and I'm glad we have here something for everyone.
I see, you have several edits in Estonia, so I assume you know about 'every mans right' in Estonia. By law, everyone can pass trough private land if there is no fence on sign from owner

Hi, source is my gps. We have used this route several times with bicycles.
To be honest, last time maybe 3 years ago. There was no problems passing private properties.

Kablis olete paar aastat tagasi redigeerinud way/69452535, mis peaks olema aed - fence. Käisime kohal ja sellist aeda seal küll ei näinud?

Mis on saanud sellest planeeritud spordirajast? Käisime seda metsas otsimas, aga selle tracki pealt ei leidnud mingit nähtavat rada.

way/35594739 - kõrgepingeliini raudtee ääres ei eksisteeri enam looduses

You are using Esri World Imagery for your corrections, but this imagery is shifted. Suggest to use Estonia Ortho (Maaamet) which is more precise

There are very many hiking routes around the world, which have no markings in real nature. It does not mean that such routes are less valuable for hikers.
For your region I have used non-standard tag:
hidden_route=hiking
so it should be not visible in any renderer.
I can't understand why this relation is problem for you.

I'm agree

Why you deleted ascent and descent tags? I have written permission from publisher to use Rother Wanderführer data on OSM

Hi,
osmc:symbol is for rendering purposes:
osmc:symbol=*
This symbol must not be equal with physical markings on path. For that is tag symbol.
So I can't understand why it bothers you.
There are thousands of hiking routes around world which have no markings on ground. It doesn't mean that we cant' map them for hikers to follow.

I corrected only wikipedia tag, but you changed back name order made by Jay May. I agree with you about naming.

Tegin nüüd selle raja alguse õigesti. Matkaradasid on hea vaadata lehel https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=8420539&map=13!58.7286!23.9429
Edasi tegemiseks tuleb sinna relatsiooni 8420539 hakata lisama järgmisi teid.
Tegelikult tuleks enne jätkamist küsida RMK käest, kas nad lubavad oma kodulehte kasutada selle raja kaardistamise allikana. See on ikkagi RMK autoriõiguse küsimus.

Muuseas, millise allika põhjal te seda uut matkateed tähistama hakkasite?

Sellepärast ei näegi, et igale lisatud joonele tuleb määrata tag-id mis selgitavad, mida see joon tähendab. Matkaraja tähistamiseks kasutatakse *relatsioone*, mitte ei joonistata olemasolevaid teid üle. See on tõesti keerukam ja alguseks ehk mitte sobiv.

Olete 29.juunil kaardile kandnud joone Penijõelt Kirblani, aga pole sellele lisanud ühtegi tagi. Mida see joon tähistab?

Ok, lets' use Apr-Oct

I found some statistic for start time but not for end time. I try to be more safe and not include October

You have used maxspeed:conditional=110 @ summer. Have you tested this condition with some navigators? OsmAnd does not recognizes this condition. I have tested 110 @ Apr-Sep which is more correct period and works with OsmAnd. Do you have any objection to such correction?