Howdy, any chance you remember what's up with these not:railways?

way/920642655
way/920642656
way/920642657

Recent photos at https://jmapb.github.io/hilton_holiday_gardens/

I was snapping a pic of the path so I could add it later (which I did) but I wondered if this area would merit some additional designation. Still not a park imo; landuse=recreation_ground seems the closest well-known tag. (Wouldn't conflict with natural=scrub if you think that still applies.)

Hello, I've reverted this changeset (adding many bogus clinics) in changeset/168111163.

Please refrain from adding incorrect information to the map. This data is in heavy use by real people across the world. Thanks.

Regarding Hilton Holiday Gardens (way/627639475), the parks department classifies this as "Recreational Field/Courts" at https://www.nycgovparks.org/parks/hilton-holiday-gardens/ ... I didn't see anyone playing here, but I could imagine it. What do you think of landuse=recreation_ground?

Yeah just a typo. But this is actually an automotive leasing broker (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_leasing) and I'm not sure it should be amenity=car_rental. Maybe closer to shop=car. There's a short mention of this question under osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dcar#leasing-only but no resolution. Maybe it belongs under office -- there are no cars, just people handling the paperwork.

All moot in this case, though, because this business is now closed -- I marked it as disused.

Hi vanessatryfi, thanks for your contribution! Boris & Horton is already mapped as a cafe node (node/5603534984) so I added the dog=yes tag there. It's part of an existing building, so drawing it as its own building isn't correct -- I deleted the extra building.

Human error uploading changeset -- comment should be "update and align pois", source should be "survey;local knowledge;nyorthos;bing aerial;business websites"

Hi dannmer, did you confirm that this building construction is complete?

Hi there VulpesInculta, can you explain your thinking behind these reclassifications?

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group

Hi Ben Stillss, these changes appear to be vandalism. Reverted in changeset/164530980 and reported to the OSM Data Working Group