thanks for fixing those! i thought i was being extra careful with the boundaries i edited, but it looks like i missed a couple.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168032605

hey, don't forget source:addr=Kendall County on these, we want to make it clear that these are authoritative
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167711363

hey there! thanks for adding local info to the map!
just FYI: in OSM, we spell out all parts of a roadway, like "Lane". happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167665856

are we sure these shouldn't be `ref` tags, not names? they feel very ref-y
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167416433

Actually, the trail came from a GPX trace recorded by Village of Minooka Public Works. It does seem that the GPX wasn't properly validated/cleaned before being used, though. But we do have access to high-resolution leaf-off imagery that clearly shows paths in this area. Some look pretty informal, but they're there.

a number of these buildings were already in the map. please be a little more careful so you don't duplicate features that already exist
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166264590

great edits for the most part, but you snapped a couple of fences to the montgomery admin boundary. use the iD editor settings to turn boundary features off to avoid that in the future. keep up the great work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167388323

Really late to the game here, but this looks like the I&M canal to me?

i know this was a minute ago, but regarding your not on the grassland next to the fire station: `landuse=meadow` would be a space designated for pasturing animals or growing hay. this is more likely a `natural=grassland`

*is* this a driveway? seems like it's only used to access parking spaces
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165992996

not sure what you did editing this one, but watch out. you converted to adjacent closed ways into weird multipolygons
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166035941

thanks for cleaning that up! just be careful, you deleted a legitimate address point. already fixed, and not a big deal. thanks again!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165922611

why add the business details to the area? now the bank and its address are split
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165901835

in some cases, the amenity=school tag is on the area corresponding to the school grounds, and is not needed on the point.

i don't like mapping schools inconsistently like this, but it's good enough for now. maybe eventually we swap the amenity areas for `landuse=education`, but i think this is okay to leave as is.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165911711

i missed that one. good catch!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165938077

what happened here? i see you already fixed these with real footprints, but i'm curious what this was about
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165004479

watch your changeset comments, this wasn't a minooka edit
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165638963

make sure to change your changeset comment when you're doing different kinds of work
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165006476

you extended roads here, but left the noexit=yes tags on nodes further north. also the new streets you drew crossed without intersecting. disconnected streets can't be routed properly. i already fixed it!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165400591

make sure your sidewalks stop at the pavement. the portion in the road would be highway=footway + footway=crossing
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165401320