these are operated by the school, not the city. operator for sidewalks will typically follow the road, but if the footpath is off on private property, not along the right-of-way, it will probably be something else
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185501625

Thanks for catching all of these. I've followed up with the intern doing this work to use the proper tag moving forward.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185705733

what are the tags on node/13936369283? node/13936369183

are they just GPS metadata?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184063415

you probably just "bumped" a preset in iD, but you dropped a bunch of valid tags off of the bakery POI and turned it into a "compass_rose" feature? I put it all back.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/184439164

thanks for adding power features to the map! the poles along the line are usually tagged "power=pole", by the way.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/185078354

the church isn't the only tenant of this building, so i wouldn't tag the whole thing based on the church. also landuse doesn't go on buildings
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183319534

sorry, landuse doesn't go on buildings either. the whole property
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183319490

thanks for fixing so many of these building shapes!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183276017

landuse doesn't belong on POI nodes. also, this is a case where the OSM tag and US english don't perfectly align. i would actually tag this as education=kindergarten and drop the amenity tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183314892

landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI. you could tag the church property area, though
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183315944

the landuse tag doesn't belong on a POI
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/183316643

these footprints got a little messed up, looks like. could you revisit these and straighten up the corners?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182850108

some of these look like towers, definitely a step up form poles. maybe with "design=h-frame" added?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182485524

it's fine to convert the node to an area, but you deleted all the address tags and did not move them to the area
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182394302

some of these building shapes aren't even close. i know this was a while ago, but i hope your building mapping has gotten a little more careful since then

Looks great! Thanks for adding these details!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181697179

Oh, well hello there, stranger!

Just a heads up: street names in OSM get spelled out in full, like "South Adams Street".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181684184

it probably looks like an import, but no! i digitized all of these by hand! just waited to conflate and upload in one go

those were real addresses assigned by the county. why delete them?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177071528

this is the high point of the county, but i don't think it's actually named as such; is it named on a map you were referencing? i would not call it a peak, either, it's just a spot that's a little higher than what's around it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178012602