OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
182247068

Hi,
seems like you deleted the railway=station/railway=halt node. Was there a reason for it?
uic_ref really primarily makes sense on this node, and the station will currently not be rendered at all in Carto.

182097538

uic_ref also doesn't make sense on the building, this belongs to railway=station or railway=halt

182097538

There is no railway=station or railway=halt in your recently edited stations any more, was this an intentional change?

Carto now displays no stations there any more, and the wiki also does not look like this is correct.

(I noticed this because I use the stations and uic_ref tags as source for the locations of stations from the timetable, and these now fail to match)

69875119

uic_ref in the Baltic states generally seems to be mis-tagged. The codes do not match with the values on https://www.interrail.eu/en/plan-your-trip/interrail-timetable#/ and https://www.cfl.lu/en-gb/timetable (open browser devtools to see them in the responses).

Before I start fixing them, I'd like to understand how this happened. Which data source did you use?

157056611

Meines Wissens nach existieren IBNRs nur für Bahnhöfe die in UIC Merits enthalten sind. Vermutlich liefert die Bahn in Nordmatzedonien keine Fahrplandaten an UIC Merits.

157056611

Hi!
I needed the ibnr to match stations from the Deutsche Bahn Hafas API to OSM. I found out the ibnrs by querying their API with a small script, but the API has gone defunct since.
You can however use the ÖBB endpoint instead with my fork of pyhafas (https://github.com/jbruechert/pyhafas/commits/zpcg-scraper/).

The script is then really simple:
```
from pyhafas import HafasClient
from pyhafas.profile import OEBBProfile
import sys

client = HafasClient(OEBBProfile())

locations = client.locations(sys.argv[1])
print([(s.name, s.id) for s in locations])
```

122745858

I found 7200012 as the UIC code from the Deutsche Bahn API, were did this information come from?