Imagery: https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/151.20587199926376,-33.90801303932399,18/user/62e7e060d84998000537975e/62e7e606d849980005379761

Imagery: https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/151.20587199926376,-33.90801303932399,18/user/62e7e060d84998000537975e/62e7e606d849980005379761

Imagery: https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/151.20587199926376,-33.90801303932399,18/user/62e7e060d84998000537975e/62e7e606d849980005379761

Just uploaded the imagery I took to https://map.openaerialmap.org/#/151.20586931705475,-33.90801303932399,18/user/62e7e060d84998000537975e/62e7e606d849980005379761

I fixed the error relating to intersecting segments, but I see there is still one issue:
> Two rings touch each other at this node. This is not necessarily invalid but often indicates suboptimal mapping.

Is this okay or do you know how to go about fixing it? Thanks for your time.

Ah I see the line is overlapping but not connected, I'll try and fix that. Thanks for raising.

You beat me by 4 hours! :D

Thanks!

Hello, I drive on this road a lot and it's not a toll road - it turns into a toll road west of the Marsh st Intersection (to the left). Could you explain why you tagged it as such? Thanks :)

Sorry I missed this. The cop said bicycles are allowed when no curb between light rail track and the "pedestrian street". North of Druitt St there is no barrier so I believe it is legal. I definitely find it confusing.

Hi,
Good idea, I added the curb cut and ramp in this changeset: changeset/90808028#map=19/-33.88802/151.20150

Please let me know if I could make it better :)

Thanks for adding the Bream Street contraflow cycle lane - I heard of it through BIKEast and came to map it but you beat me :)

Hi, do you know what the way without tags 556923706 is? Am I okay to remove it?
I noticed some other nearby lines without tags and asked Warin61 about them here: changeset/60858740#map=15/-33.9223/151.2489

Yep I made a mistake here, thanks. I changed the tags back to the original.

Hi,
The ID validator picked up this "Line with no descriptive tags", way id 383391758.
I can't remember noticing this before, I'm not sure if I'm not understanding something about OSM, it is a mistake of yours, or ID is doing something funny. Do you know what this is?
I also noticed way/589598708 in a year-old changeset by myself nearby which I never previously noticed, and way/176523359 by jaecord.

Hello,
I think you have incorrectly used the "level" field when you should have used "levels". It's a very subtle difference - levels means the number of levels in the building, level means if building/shop is at ground level (0), underground (-1) or above etc. I'll fix it up for the occurrences here.

Hello,
Thanks for your contributions! In future please don't add the address (number/street) into the name field of buildings - that's what the address fields are for. If you are adding duplicate info in OSM chances are there is a better way.
See osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag for more info :)

Thanks very much for letting me know. I missed the shop type when using OsmAnd as I couldn't find it at the time, and forgot to add later. Fixed in changeset/72249811.
Is there any way I could verify my own edits after adding POIs on mobile? ID would have picked this up but my understanding is that it doesn't work on mobile yet. Would love to not make these small errors.

Thanks very much for that, there is only one in the building. I must have missed the other one when surveying on foot with OsmAnd.

Oops, thanks so much for letting me know. I must have missed it or OsmAnd hadn't updated with it.
I just removed the Bunnings I added in changeset/71587623.