Hi, do you know what the way without tags 556923706 is? Am I okay to remove it?
I noticed some other nearby lines without tags and asked Warin61 about them here: changeset/60858740#map=15/-33.9223/151.2489

Yep I made a mistake here, thanks. I changed the tags back to the original.

Hi,
The ID validator picked up this "Line with no descriptive tags", way id 383391758.
I can't remember noticing this before, I'm not sure if I'm not understanding something about OSM, it is a mistake of yours, or ID is doing something funny. Do you know what this is?
I also noticed way/589598708 in a year-old changeset by myself nearby which I never previously noticed, and way/176523359 by jaecord.

Hello,
I think you have incorrectly used the "level" field when you should have used "levels". It's a very subtle difference - levels means the number of levels in the building, level means if building/shop is at ground level (0), underground (-1) or above etc. I'll fix it up for the occurrences here.

Hello,
Thanks for your contributions! In future please don't add the address (number/street) into the name field of buildings - that's what the address fields are for. If you are adding duplicate info in OSM chances are there is a better way.
See osm.wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag for more info :)

Thanks very much for letting me know. I missed the shop type when using OsmAnd as I couldn't find it at the time, and forgot to add later. Fixed in changeset/72249811.
Is there any way I could verify my own edits after adding POIs on mobile? ID would have picked this up but my understanding is that it doesn't work on mobile yet. Would love to not make these small errors.

Thanks very much for that, there is only one in the building. I must have missed the other one when surveying on foot with OsmAnd.

Oops, thanks so much for letting me know. I must have missed it or OsmAnd hadn't updated with it.
I just removed the Bunnings I added in changeset/71587623.

Sorry, I must have thought I removed it.
Fixed.

Hi,
Thanks very much for letting me know.
I came back to fix up the tags and then realised the construction has finished, so I updated the paths to their present state.

Thanks for the advice, I really appreciate it.

Thanks very much for your help, see 68079332 for the changes I made. I added a short way heading off in the direction of the fork and added a note, and when I didn't know the direction added a note on a note along the path.
If there's anything else I can improve please let me know.

Hi Warin61,
Thanks for commenting.
What would be the best way to indicate to other mappers that I have only mapped one route from the fork, should I add a note instead?

Hi, thank you very much for fixing my mistake, sorry.

Hey, thanks very much. Upon further reading I realise I misunderstood how turn restrictions work, I'll make sure to do them correctly in future.

Perfect, exactly what I needed. Thanks.

Cheers :)

Thanks very much, fixed. I missed the difference between "Footpath" and "Foot Path" in ID editor. I'll do more reading up on path types.

Thanks very much, I checked again today while cycling and that's right.

Thanks very much.

Hi, thanks for letting me know, you're absolutely right. I'll remove it now.