This is another Pacific Electric line as well, maybe you should research what this is before u get another high off of editing this site 😭

Stick to the UK bud the wiki page on Demolished Railways is clear that there is no consensus on this topic, and local factors make this relevant. The page even mentions that mapping Glendale Blvd is "A borderline case." Sure, glendale blvd might not need the tag, but there are parts of Silver lake and the Hollywood subway that aare obviously railroad infrastructure. Underneath 1st street and Sunset Blvd the electric catenary still exists on the bridge. Please stick to ur local area on issues like this and get a job dude.

"A borderline case may be where a railway was dismantled and replaced with a road of the same geometry."

This isnt even close to the current status of the ROW. Get a job man stop wasting your life editing all day for ur own sake.

"Overall, mapping such features is acceptable where some remains like embankments, remains of bridges, etc., remain, even if rails are gone. In locations where the railway has been replaced by new buildings and roads, the mapping of such features becomes out of scope for OpenStreetMap." Please stick to the UK!!!! You dont live here and see the multiple bridges over the ROW, all the LA Metro property signage, and numerous remenants of the ballast bed in the area!!! Get a job!!!

Sure!

Hello
This is the Balboa Line. Please see its Wikipedia article to learn more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balboa_Line . It is also visible from the ground, and is quite well known in the area. Please learn more about an area before recklessly removing something that exists.

Hello, this was marked as proposed, and its the official policy of the state to construct this in the future along here... is there any other reason to not include this other than time wise? There currently is a bill in the legislature to open up funding for this, its not like it wont exist within the typical lifetime...

Why did you change the freeway ramps to secondary links near olympic & santa fe?

What was the point of this? The state still signs this as part of CA 91, not CA 91 Hist, and its still maintained either directly by the state or one of its subdivisions...

CA 99 being a future interstate has been roadgeek speculation for well over a decade at this point. Also, as I and Minh Nguyen pointed out, California Streets and Highways Code already define a Route 7 and Route 9 (California state law does not distinguish between any type of state route, whether that be an interstate, U.S. highway, or CA Shield route). There is no legislative policy that this designation will occur anytime soon. Also, California is in a budget deficit, I doubt the Legislature will want to burn hundreds of millions of dollars on changing signs…, and these are just a few of many other reasons why this is an inappropriate edit

What made you decide to add this to OSM? California Streets and Highways Code §§ 307 and 309 already define two different state routes designated as Route 7 and 9 respectively, so this is definitely not going to happen before 2027 when bills passed by the California Legislature in 2026 go into effect.... This edit should probably be undone

This section is designated as a freeway by the California Transportation Commission. Also, there is a discussion on Slack related to OSM road classifications in California on Slack. Please refer to that before making any changes

There are no pedestrian crossings here except at the terminus. Is this why you downgraded the entire segment even though it meets motorway standards?

Thanks for letting me know, I was not aware of this at all!

What the fuck is your problem? The rail routes ROW still exists here and in almost all the other places that you undid my edits shitstain. I LITERALLY SPENT HOURS MAPPING THESE AND, IN THIS CASE, LITERALLY JUST COMPLETING THE TAGS ON A FEATURE THAT ALREADY EXISTED WHICH ALREADY FOLLOWS AN EXISTING ROW. I HOPE U GET HIT BY A CAR

Well the ROW still exists quite clearly, although parts of it have been developed upon. However, the tracks are still in the asphalt of PCH & the bridge abutments still exist across Ballona creek, among other things. It’s not one of those which have had all traces in the ground be erased.

Okay will do!

yikes!

I changed them because they seemed to be like any other residential road, mostly based on the time that I spend in the area. If you think that these were wrong feel free to revert the changes. This is just what I thought "tertiary" meant.