Hey
In this changeset, you've deleted two buildings which are still visible on the imagery, both in (the newly added park) way/1040757515/
Are the buildings demolished?
Greetings from Bern,
habi

Ciao blümlisalp

Du hast hier rund um way/875518437/ einige Flüssli eingetragen.
Hast du diese selbst gesehen, oder 'einfach' vom Terrainmodell her extrapoliert?
Im Katasterplan Bern tauchen die drum nicht auf, und machen dort in der Gegend einige https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr -Fehler.
Gruess us Bärn,
habi

Isch doch kein Problem, wir sind ja da um alle gemeinsam OSM besser zu machen.
Ich wusste gar nicht, dass via Etrex auch 'Notizen' gemacht werden können, cool!

I think I need to reboot my machine :)

I don't know why JOSM failed to use my changeset comment: I added some buildings, aligned the Via ai Monti and some other highways/path to imagery and Strava Heatmap.

Ciao luja
In this changeset you've added `addr:place=CERN, SITE DE MEYRIN` to some of the building on the Meyrin-side of CERN (but not all of them).
I honestly don't think that adding this address in all-caps is a sensible thing to do.
Did you really survey *all* the addresses here yourself?

Am Bahnhof Reckingen fand ich keinen TicketAutomaten. Ich habe diesen Knoten zu einem InformationBoard umgeändert.

Ah, du meinst https://wandrer.earth/, nicht die Künstler-Webseite mit .com.

Ich wiederhole mich, die Wege *sind* da, also können/sollen sie gemappt werden. Damit Komoot/Wandrer diese ignorieren, könnte das mit dem richtigen `access`-Tag gelöst werden, bzw. alle Wege in `landuse=military` sollten von denen ignoriert werden.

Hallo Helga.
Ich hab' deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht und das Bettenhaus Lehmann an den richtigen Ort verschoben.
E Gruess us Bärn,
habi

Ciao bulugi

Es ist *nicht* sinnvoll diese Wege aus OpenStreetMap zu löschen.
Die Wege *sind* in der Realität da, und OpenStreetMap bildet die Realität ab.
Zusätzlich sind diese gut auf den Luftbildern zu sehen, können also von jedem User oder Userin wieder eingefügt werden.
Die Wege liegen im Gebiet des Waffenplatz Chur (way/234973615), Progamme und Dienste, die mit OpenStreetMap-Daten umgehen 'wissen' das und behandeln die Wege auch als im militärischen Sperrgebiet liegend.
Ich habe deine Löschung hier rückgängig gemacht: changeset/118325787

E Gruess us Bärn,
habi

Hello again.
Also here it does *not* make sense do simply delete the 'offending' ways, since they are visible on aerial imagery and the Strava Heatmap, so anyone can add the paths again to OpenStreetMap.
I thus reverted your changeset and added `access=private` to the ways you deleted.
I did this in changeset/118319939 and am happy to discuss this further, either directly here in the changeset comments or via the messaging feature on OpenStreetMap.
Happy mapping, greetings from Switzerland,
habi

I reverted your changes and added ? `access=private` in changeset/118319403

I reverted your changes and added ? `access=private` in changeset/118319403

I reverted your changes and added ? `access=private` in changeset/118319403

Also here: please do *not* simply remove 'private' areas from OpenStreetMap.
Simply removing it does not hinder anyone of adding it again to OpenStreetMap based on aerial imagery and survey.
The *much more* sensible way of updating this information is the correct tagging of the tracks, e.g. adding an `access=private` tag to the objects in question.
Because of this I reverted your changeset and added `access=private` to the ways you deleted.

PS1: I came here because of https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious#2/25.3/20.4
PS2: I'm happy to communicate in German, too.

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please do *not* simply remove 'private' areas from OpenStreetMap.
Simply removing it does not hinder anyone of adding it again to OpenStreetMap based on aerial imagery and survey.
The *much more* sensible way of updating this information is the correct tagging of the tracks, e.g. adding an `access=private` tag to the objects in question.

Because of this I reverted your changeset and added `access=private` to way/388912082 and way/199026877

Please let me know if this is OK with you.

Ciao mircozorzo
You've added several nodes here tagged with `Friendship=Park` which seems like a translation error or a copy-paste mistake.
Can you correct those?

Saluti della Svizzera,
habi

PS: I came here because of http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm

Hey
You've added a bunch of unknown tags in this changeset, e.g. `E=M`, `F=Fn`, `P=C` and `T=oui`, which haven't appeared in OSM before.
Can you explain those?
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

You also failed to connect most of the highways you've added with each other, rendering them essentially useless.