I don't understand the text completely, even translated, but the 'Rätsche Alpen' show up in https://www.skgeodesy.sk/files/sk/slovensky/ugkk/geodezia-kartografia/standardizacia-geografickeho-nazvoslovia/nazvy-geografickych-objektov-z-uzemia-mimo-sr/exonyma-januar_2022.pdf, so it's probably all good.
I was just a bit bummed to see "all rights reserved" at the bottom of the page.

Thanks for the clarification, happy mapping

According to deepl.com, the emails on osm.wiki/WikiProject_Slovakia/Sources only mention "https://ako.vugk.sk/ (Atribúty katastrálneho operátu)" and "ortofotomozaiky SR zo stránky https://www.geoportal.sk/sk/", but not "skgeodesy.sk" as data sources, even though the emails are from persons @skgeodesy.sk.

Ciao Martin
The source you’re citing gives „ All rights reserved.“ on their site.
I know it’s „just“ a translation of the name, but we are not allowed to copy copyrighted data into OpenStreetMap.
Greetings from Switzerland,
Habi

Google-Daten dürfen nicht für OpenStreetMap genutzt werden.
Es ist auch nicht nötig, das Tor einzutragen, die Hauszufahrt ist implizit privat.

note/3910837 mentions that there is *no* path on the north side of the building.
Is there really one, or not?

Ciao Jolesh
I'm on a "fixing" spree for changing `amenity=fixme` added with EveryDoor.
Could the Villa B Lanca (node/10180084719/) be a amenity=hookah_lounge?
At least this comes up when looking at their Facebook page.
Greetings,
habi

> I can't see it on Bing imagery, among all images it's only seen on Mapbox, everywhere else it's just a field.

Weird, in JOSM it seems to load different imagery for Bing than in iD.
You're correct that there's only a path visible on one imagery layer.

I was only wondering if it's a 'Wanderweg' since there's a guidepost mapped at the other end of the path.

Maybe needs another survey from below :)

Happy mapping!

Great, thanks!

Ciao Paul
I think that *all* these pools should have been added with `access=private`, as they are in backyards of private residences.
Greetings,
habi

PS: I'm here in the region because of note/3906089 :)

The address data `source` is not in the building.
It has been suggested that tagging the `source` on the changeset is a more "modern" approach than tagging it on each object: source=*#How_to_use_on_changesets

I have set up JOSM in such a way and try to go as far as listing the relevant ZIP file from Simons GWR extracts, as seen here: changeset/141544795

Happy mapping,
habi

Oder, wenn in Geleisenähe eher railway=milestone

highway=milestone wäre evtl. ein sinnvolles Tagging.

Ciao dpolovinkin

The part of the path that you've deleted here is visible on Bing imagery and lights up quite a bit on the Strava Heatmap.

According to this it seems to me that this parth might actually connect way/29264314/ and node/5481161347/, where there's also a guidepost mapped.

Cuold not be that the (informal) path is just currently not visible?

Greetings,
habi

Ciao SG550-1

According to note/3899631 (and the aerial imagery) it seems that the waterfall is not in the middle of the industrial landuse here.

From looking at the map data and a cursory search on the internet the waterfall should probably be closer to node/360918123/
Can you confirm that with your 'local knowledge'?

Greetings,
habi

I'm here in the region because of note/3900622

I'm here in the region because of note/3900622

I'm here in the region because of note/3900622

"Duplicated node without tag"

Sorry for the large changeset, I've missed some stuff lingering in JOSM while I wanted to solve the notes mentioned in the comment.

Danke für die Antwort, und sorry für die späte Rück-Antwort :)
Bei der Geschichte ging's schlussendlich um Löschung einiger Bunker und @Eagleeye_ZRH
Dessen Account ist leider mittlerweile gesperrt, so dass keine weiter Kommunikation in dieser Sache möglich ist.
Gruss,
Habi