Hey Andy
Hier hast du dem Gebäude way/96423022 `name=Grenzweg` verpasst.
Das ist ziemlich sicher ziemlich falsch, die Adresse des Gebäudes ist nach dem Gebäude- und Wohnungsregister [1] korrekt erfasst.

Ich habe den Namen am Gebäue entfernt.

Gruss,
Habi

[1]: https://qa.poole.ch/addresses/ch/

Das sah eher wie "landuse=residential + residential=trailer_park" (siehe osm.wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dstatic_caravan) aus, ich hab' das so geändert :)

Siehe https://www.derbund.ch/440178904938

Revertiert

changeset/165285787

Dann habe ich etwas falsch verstanden, auf https://www.wullehus.ch/ taucht drum nur Konolfingen auf.

Falsch, note/4712195 erledigt :)

Hey!
Idealerweise hättest du aber nicht nur den Namen, sondern auch alle anderen Infos vom Wullehuus, die noch auf dem POI sind auch angepasst ;)
Gruss,
Habi

Merci!

Ciao vatlark
The `ref` would be more something like "1-1001-12345" than "Rue Jean-Dassier 5" :)
I stumbled over your changeset because of note/4708957, happy mapping,
habi

In addition, you mapped the school node/12556169145/history as a node, but the school is already mapped as a way since several years: way/464561590/history

Spot-checking things here all of those deleted trees are still visible on aerial imagery, websites of deleted shops still work and things don't look like they should just be deleted.

Very important too is that your changeset comment is simply ".", which is definitively a no-go [1].
Please explain what you're doing here in OpenStreetMap, if we don't hear back from you in some days I'll ask the data working group [2] for a block on your account and look into a revert of *all* your changes.

Grettings,
habi

[1]: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
[2]: osm.wiki/Data_Working_Group

Ciao Apprenti

- Here you've mapped a cemetery as node (node/12556120209) while the cemetery node/12556120209 is already present since 14 years in OpenStreetMap.

- You deleted the parking node/2345648095 while it is still very much visible on aerial imagery

- You deleted way/225477967/history which is still very much visible, too

- In addition, you moved a node around a lot: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162118176 which has since been corrected.

Again, can you explain what you're trying to achieve?

Greetings,
habi

Ciao Apprenti 2024

Welcome to OpenStreetMap (in theory), it's good that you try to help keep the map data up to date.
In this changeset here you deleted a *lot* of things that are either still visible on the aerial imagery from swisstopo or their website lists them as still present: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=162117825
Can you explain what you're aiming to do here in OpenStreetMap, with a public dataset that is used in a lot of places and apps?

Greetings from Bern,
habi

PS: I'm here because of note/4709155 where someone noticed that you deleted a lot of public-transport infrastructure around Tavannes.

👌🏼

I don't think that querying the changesets makes the process more cumbersome, I think that having unnecessary tags on the object themselves leads to stale data, because editors might update the feature and *not* update the source tag at all.

Ich hab' das jetzt in changeset/164771236 so umgesetzt.
Richtige Dachform aus Orthofotos und start_date=1953

Wenn's aus deiner Sicht nicht stimmt einfach nochmals korrigieren.

Ä Gruess us Bärn,
habi

Ciao Pan
Here you've added way/1117729356 with `roof:shape=1`.
It's not entirely clear from the aerial imagery what the correct roof shape should be, so I simply removed it.
If you care, you can put the correct value back.
Happy mapping,
habi

Ciao Pan
Here you've added a bunch of `roof:shape=gab` to entrances, which is most probably a copy-paste error.
I removed those values (and the non-necessary `source`) in changeset/164770628
Happy mapping,
habi

changeset/164770362

Ciao imagoiq
I like the typo `roof:shape=gabeled` that you introduced for some roofs here.
Nonetheless I corrected it to 'roof:shape=gabled'.
Greetings from Bern,
habi