OpenStreetMap
greatnameguys2472's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 181964216 | New imagery, aligned building |
|
| 184235322 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184235592 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184235624 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184235784 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184235829 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184235847 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184235875 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184235983 | Reverted per DWG Advice |
|
| 184230275 | Why would some of these be sidewalks if they don't run along the side a road |
|
| 184230035 | Please stop with this undiscussed mass removal of driveways |
|
| 184202759 | If they're private, just mark them as access=private |
|
| 184202759 | Why are you deleting validly mapped driveways? |
|
| 183327487 | Hi, you mentioned in your note that you source the name from Google Streetview, but that data is copyrighted and not allowed on OSM. I went ahead and reverted this change |
|
| 183279767 | Acknowledged. |
|
| 181858332 | Survey |
|
| 181743666 | Local knowledge |
|
| 181586096 | True, though I've found that not using a multi polygon for natural wood within residential areas can create overlapping issues sometimes. I'll go ahead and remove the park from the relation since that was put in there a while ago |
|
| 88849036 | What even is this changeset comment lmao??? |
|
| 180526649 | Hi there, welcome to OSM. Please do be more careful in the future as it seems like you have changed an interchange back to it's previous configuration after it has been upgraded recently |