Hei Kristoffer
Velkommen til OSM :)
Litt feedback til dette og liknende endringssett.
Det ser ut til at du har forvekslet "residential" og "driveway".
highway=residential brukes om det som vi på norsk gjerne kaller gater og veier (oftest kommunale).
Det som vi gjerne på norsk gjerne kaller for oppkjørsler (oftest private) blir helst tagget med highway=service service=driveway.
Hvis du ser i kartet nå, er oppkjørslene "dine" blitt fete og tydelige, mens en del av veiene er blitt tynne og pinglete :D
Selvsagt best om du ordner dette selv. men jeg kan godt hjelpe til hvis du vil.

You need to relax a bit.
Having some duplicates is not a big problem. A bigger problem is that you keep deleting true information. Last time you did this to one of my contributions, the multipolygon got deleted by someone else "because it was empty", making investigation even harder.
If you really want to avoid duplicates, don't jut delete the multipolygon. Rather add the aerodrome node to the multipolygon as the ARP.
Also, if you have concerns about how orher people map, write a changeset comment and don't just delete stuff. Otherwise we have no way, as a community, to improve.
As this is the second time you do this to data I have contributed, I am tempted to report you to the Data Working Group as I am sure you have done the same with multiple other aerodromes.

nikoo
How are you planning to revert? We are talking 11000 objects. I looked into using the reverter plugin, but that still left 8-900 objects with conflicts. The more manual work done to fix it, the harder it will get to do a full revert of the two changesets. So I strongly recommend we cooperate on this task.

(Also JOSM already, by default, warns about moving many objects. There should be no need for a plugin for this purpose)

And changeset/71615846 is probably the tail end of this changeset after it failed at 10000 objects.

Fixing misalignment, you say. Yet at least some nodes have moved about 10 m out of place in this changeset: One example: node/2411503427
There is an upper limit for the size of changesets. It's currently set to 10,000 objects per changeset. This changeset contains 10 thousand objects. I suspect you had many nodes selected and then you accidentally moved all of them at the same time.

I suggest we should revert this changeset.

It was _not_ an old scool multipolygon...

Then why didn't you do as you suggested yourself? Now there is no rendering of the outer perimeter of the aerodrome...

Sensible? I disagree.

There were two aerodrome objects:
* A multipolygon with several correct tags and outline of the aerodrome.
* A node with fewer tags than the MP.

They both represent the same object but are not exact duplicates. The MP had significantly more information in it.
Then someone delete _all_ of the tags on the multipolygon? I don't call that sensible.

With that edit, the rendering of the aerodrome outline disappeared, f.ex.

Also: The edit you refer to was done by a editor with only a handful of edits at the time.

Also: Your changeset comment is misleading. Deleting an untagged MP is not the same as "fixing old-style multipolygons"

I see. It was that edit was in the wrong. Don't know if you looked into this before you deleted the relation? Reverted.

reverted

The nightmare is certainly you deleting information from the more complete relation. If only you had copied the tags from the aerodrome node...
Sometimes duplicate information is accepted. The world is not black and white. :/

What was wrong this multipolygon? Did it warrant outright deleting it?

Hei. Ser at en rundkjøring (way/645963847/history) ble tagget som oneway=yes i heller enn junction=roundabout. Kanskje dette var noe som kom fra nvdb via et script el.l?

Also added some flares to roundabouts.

ADDRESS var brukt 88 ganger før dette og 125 ganger i dette changesettet.

Flott med import, men kanskje normalisere adressetaggene litt?
ADDRESS=PLOGFABRIKKVEGEN 2, 4353 KLEPP STASJON
Er ikke osm.wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema bedre?

Det er nok bare en 'søndags-filial' til Extra Øksnevad som ligger i samme bygg. Inngang i hver sin ende av bygget. Bygget er ganske nytt og ble bygget for Coop, så det ville overraske om de allerede er rebrandet.
Men kan ta en sving innom en dag og dobbeltsjekke.

Veldig bra kommentert! Da er det lett å forstå hva du tenkte og kan få konstruktiv tilbakemelding.

Hei J :)
Så lenge det er mulig å kjøre eller gå igjennom, er det best å beholde den gjennomgående veien. Det holder med barrier=block på noden.
traffic_calming er det ikke nødvendig å ha på ways, hvis de enkelte humpene er tagget på noder.
Den søndre delen av Granveien har mistet sin highway=* tag? Og hva mener du med direction=both?

Better now?