Also, some of the tags you put on the new railway ways, might as well go on the relation, so you don't need to add the same tags on every way. Thinking of name, gauge, start_date, end_date. Also, you added a source tag to each element; that better go into "Sources" field as you save the changeset in iD.

Seems like iD (the online editor) prioritizes rendering of highway tags over railway tags when they are both present on a way. So what may visually look like a road in iD, is actually also tagged (correctly) as abandoned railway. So the two railway ways are still there, side by side, visible in iD, while one just _looks_ like a road...

Er dette det samme som i Oslo gate 35? Kanskje den har flyttet? https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/oslo-overgangsbolig-gamlebyen-avdeling.5025025-237612.html

Thank you for your contribution. However, it seems like a good number of the ways you added to Kragerøbanen are more or less duplicates of already existing ways.
This relation contains all the existing ways: relation/1704761
Are you up to resolving the issue, or would you like some help on that?

Please have more descriptive changeset comments. In this changeset, a way is added. Nothing was updated as the description says?

What was the purpose of this edit? The description is effectively non existent and some of the work does not seems to achieve anything. Like, why split a roundabout in more parts than there are connecting ways, or at all for that matter?
And adding a bunch of no_u_turn restriction relation where there is no signage on ground?

What is the idea with all of these relations? Many of them are no_u_turn relations. Is there signage on the ground indicating no U turn? Or do you have something else in mind?

I'm curious to know on what basis you changed the two station name:en from Tateyama to Mt Tate? I've travelled through, and every sign says "Tateyama". Even the english announcements onboard the trains say "Tateyama". Others seems to agree: note/4716872
I plan on changing name:en and :fr back to Tateyama.

Hi Leida!
Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thank you for your contribution.
I have fixed a few of the buildings you added by changing the "area=yes" to "building=yes" and a few other fixes.

But I wonder what natural=2025 means? I guess 2025 is the current year? Is that when the building was built? Or when the school opened or something? Or maybe just when you added it?

Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thank you for your contribution.

In this changeset, you changed a tag from addr:housenumber to natural
What does natural=209 mean?
Is the house number not 209?

Hi!
What does natural=06 28 57 19 43 mean on the Cheverie de l'Est ?

Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thank you for your contribution.
In this changeset, you added two ways and tagged them with something like "natural=1". I'm not quite sure what you mean with these tags. What are these objects?

Siden når ble "standard praksis" å "tag for the renderer"?
Siden når ble taggingen din "egen"?

En røys med småveier har fått maxspeed=50 her. Fint om du rydder opp selv. Eksempel: way/782207245

Then Norgeskart is wrong in this matter. The tram track continues in a perfectly straight line onto the funicular tracks . The lengths are no longer correct and the angle of the approach to the top is no longer a straight angle to the exit tunnel. Reverted.

Men det er vel bare ét av løpene som skal bygges nå i første byggetrinn?
https://www.vegvesen.no/vegprosjekter/europaveg/e134vagsliseljestad/

Bare at det fortsatt var litt arbeid som gjensto med påkoblingen når jeg "åpnet" veien. Og som påminning om å stikke innom etter en stund for å sjekke alle detaljer. Men om du mener alt er fint, så er det bare til å slette :)

Oh. My bad totally the wrong source...
https://www.nve.no/konsesjon/konsesjonssaker/konsesjonssak?id=4594&type=V-1 and
https://www.nve.no/konsesjon/konsesjonssaker/konsesjonssak?id=7665&type=V-1

Fint om du rydder opp der importen ble lagt oppå eksisterende data...

Her er et eksempel: way/1312547636

Jeg funderte på det samme da jeg var innom dagen før bussene begynte å kjøre der. Jeg tegnet det litt "forenklet" da, så kan det raffineres litt når vi får flyfoto, tenker jeg...