Hi there, why was the building deleted? Also, you cannot be copying data from Google Maps. https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#2.1.5._Can_I_copy_data_from_Google?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/182212623

Hey there, thanks for the changeset! Please make sure to resolve issues that pop up in iD - looks like this changeset got flagged for having points too close together. iD will have quick fixes for warnings, usually, so it's pretty easy to resolve.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181789597

This changeset looks good, I think!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181791673

This changeset looks good, except you do have some crossing roads (Melody and Woodland) that don't have an intersecting node. iD has a warning for this, and it can automatically resolve it if you tell it to. I've gone ahead and fixed it myself, but in the future, make sure to check the warnings/issues pane in iD!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181774128

This was previously detailed here: changeset/181701405#c1587075 and reverted 2 hours before this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/181706867

This changeset moved the whole apartment complex way
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179015806

Hi there, these roads are not private access, as the public can drive along these roads at any hours of the day without restriction.

Why do you follow the right edge of the lane instead of the actual centerline? There are also weird kinks in the entrance/exit ramps to/from the service road. Also, you are being particularly passive-aggressive with these changeset comments, despite not putting your own comment on the original changeset that made these geometry changes.

Hey there! I'd like to ask why you counted lanes that weren't fully formed (you counted lanes from when they start emerging from the curb, not from when they're done emerging), which conflicts with this section in the wiki: osm.wiki/Lanes#Street

Hey there, thanks for your change! There's no need to split these streets unless something changes with their tags, like road surface or lane count. Also, landuses should generally not share nodes with roads, since they make it hard to change the landuses separate from the road way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177487460

boundary=census must be closed, why is this tag only applied to this part of the full Tucson boundary?

Hello, I believe CROF in the building name needs to be expanded to its full title, as abbreviations are usually not allowed in names. DART is fine as that is one of its official names

Hi there, and thanks for your change! The operator tag additions are nice, but I don’t think the name of a track should be named after the service that runs on it - that’s what the route relations are for. The tracks are physically for light rail vehicles, and technically any DART LRV can traverse the tracks without being on the red/blue line, so the name field should be reverted to DART Light Rail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177100622

Looks good to me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176924629

at least in Sachse it is

Isn't SH 78 signed on the ground as the street name though?

Hey there, and thanks for your contribution! This edit looks OK! If you're adding a business, be sure to add a new point with specific tags.

Hey again, thanks for the edits! The comment for the other edit stands: school tags are better on School Grounds areas rather than individual points, unless the school is only one part of an existing building. For Jones MS, the point looks a little misplaced - and that too, would be better as a School Grounds area if possible.

Hey there, welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution! Regarding the review requested: since there is an existing School Grounds area enclosing the school, you should edit/add the tags on that instead of placing a new node.

Hey there, thanks for your contribution! For the future, do you think you could not connect the landuses directly to highways (including sidewalks)? It makes it hard to update the geometry of the landuse and the adjacent highway later.