^Fixed link

RU:
osm.wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Hey Raa39,

I would like to remind you that you should add good changeset comments and follow good practice.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
(Russian:
osm.wiki/wikiRU:Good_changeset_comments )

osm.wiki/Good_practice

Do not copy from sources without a compatible license:
osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

Please send a link to the "TPAKT" navigator so we know what you mean. It is likely not compatible though(!)

Learn to map;
https://learnosm.org/

Find information;
osm.wiki/wiki/

Find other mappers;
https://openstreetmap.community/

Regards,

Daniel

Beste JJJWegdam

Je luchtfoto staat niet (meer) goed ingesteld.
Als je met Go Map!! werkt in Nederland, vooral voor verschuiven en detailleren van landgebruik en wegen, zorg dan dat je PDOK als je achtergrondlaag hebt ingesteld. Als het goed is kun je dat op deze manier doen:
https://learnosm.org/en/mobile-mapping/gomap/#setting-the-background-display
(als je de URL nodig hebt kun je dit vragen op het forum.)

Groet,

Daniel

Beste padvinder,

node/1174900409
Dit zou een vlak moeten zijn, geen punt. Waarschijnlijk een ongelukje met de app.

Echter, ik zie hier geen beheerd bos. Dit lijken me struiken die beter met een vlak natural=shrubbery of natural=scrub aangeduid kan worden. Zie de wiki-pagina voor natural=shrubbery;
natural=shrubbery

Groet,

Daniel

Beste padvinder,

Ik kom een hoop punten zonder tags tegen. Daar is iets fout gegaan.
De eerste rij lijken bomen ter vervanging van de bomenrij, alleen staat deze er nog.
De tweede rij lijken me de straatlampen.

Kijk je nog even?

Groet,

Daniel

Lijkt me prima.

node/8777260419/history
Dit is een scherpe hoek. Weet je zeker dat dit klopt? Je kan 'm anders beter langs het andere landgebruik laten lopen.

Groet,

Daniel

Beste BrandweerInfoLN,

bicycle=yes op een fietspad dat al het label highway=cycleway heeft lijkt me onnodig, dit is al opgenomen in het label. Ook covered=no is onnodig, omdat het zichtbaar geen dak heeft op de luchtfoto. Labels met "no" voeg je alleen toe als het noodzakelijk is voor de lezer (bijvoorbeeld tactile_paving=no bij een oversteek voor blinden) of een eigenschap onduidelijk is op de (lucht)foto's en je 'bang bent' dat anderen het verkeerde label erop zetten.

Kijk je nog even?

Groet,

Daniel

PS: De meeste bewerker-apps gebruiken geen PDOK, dus de positie van bv. het schuurtje kan wat afwijken. Je kan de positie naderhand altijd aanpassen in bv. iD of JOSM.

I wouldn't mind.

Hey Anne,

You should remove building=yes from the inner circle on the horse walker for it to render correctly.

Also, the horse riding area should be tagged leisure=pitch
leisure=pitch#Riding_arena
A track usually has a route (e.g. roundtrip, used in horse racing) or linear lanes (used in jousting). A pitch gives you more space to move around (used in dressure); it doesn't have a route, though in general training you'd usually make a roundtrip, which can be seen on aerial imagery.

Fyi: when changed to leisure=pitch, you do not have to mark a route, or change to an area or multipolygon. A pitch is an area by default.

Regards,

Daniel

way/683374953/history
Regarding this old way, are you sure it is a named alley? Is the footway next to it not an alley?

Regards,

Daniel

Hi, the edits you uploaded spread over a very large area. This makes them hard to track. Please upload you changes *before* you move to a new area. Apart from that they look great, keep up the mapping!

Regards,

Daniel

node/9173536458/history

There are some one-ways clashing here. The one-way heading west => east has to make a very sharp u-turn.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Ivan,

The following are ATYL tags
osm.wiki/ATYL
equipment:advisory - for suggested equipment.
equipment:mandatory - for required equipment.
phone:service - for reporting damage to the pumptrack.
phone:vandalism - for reporting vandalism (i.e. noise). It is a police number which is explicitly stated to prevent people from calling the service or police emergency number (112), as they can't intervene.
It could alternatively be left out.

The pumptrack does not have a phone number for general information, as far as I could find, as such contact:phone=no

All information can be found on the website and a sign next to the entrance of the pumptrack.

Regards,

Daniel

Hiausirg, I err on the part sticking out on one side of that building.. ;)

*;Mapillary

Hey Fabrizio,

Note, there's bussinesses along here, as well as one gate having access=yes. It is unlikely to be private.
Did you survey this? If so, how is the access signed?

Regards,

Daniel

iD may occasionally suggest incorrect or odd values (i.e. those with capital letters or spaces). This is because it takes the most popular tags from taginfo, as you may know. It also has some warnings which may suggest adding outdated/synonymous tags or similar, this you should already know. (e.g. basin tagging)

Hey Victor,

I have fixed some tags (typos) in changeset/113300989

Also, you used a combination of roof_tiles (originally contributed as "tile") and slate; these are two different things, so just fyi if you are unsure, check the wiki.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Gregory,

I've added stile=ladder and material=metal (as suggested by the rustiness) in changeset/113293001

Also, according to the wiki, "step_count=* should be set to the number of steps on one side. If step count is different on each side, the larger one should be used.", so it should be alright as is.

Furthermore, next to the stile there seems to be a segment of path (as opposed to footway). Did you tag this as path on purpose? It may be better to tag with footway and surface given how the surrounding ways are tagged.

Regards,

Daniel