way/988749977
Are you sure this is a crossing? This looks like a social path (a path which formed by frequent foot traffic), it's not even visible on the satellite imagery for me. If it's a social path and not signed as a footway/crossing, it shouldn't be mapped on OSM.
If it is a new, signed footway/crossing, then sure. Do connect it to the street it crosses for routing purposes though. Once connected, the crossing point can be marked as highway=crossing

Regards,

Daniel

PS: I'd wish there were more apps and tools to easily determine a relatively accurate height for buildings and building parts, but you can look up what exists if you'd ever like to do so. (excuse the rant)

Hey b-unicycling,

Adding a chamfer this way is fine, as it's a rule to use ground truth.
Personally, I would add it using Simple 3D if I have the possibility to survey. You may know about this method already. Regardless, I've attached some examples below:

'Chamfer' (building overhang);
way/947011970/history
(In this case it is a brick wall on a building's higher levels, with a glass window for the lower levels)

'Inverted chamfer' (building gets thinner towards the top);
way/947437087/history
(in this case it is a glass window on a building's higher levels, with a brick wall on the buildings lower levels)

The documentation for this is here:
osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings#Height_and_levels

I understand any concern on the building outline not being ground truth with this method. (the plus side I would think is that it is clearer to contributors why the corner was chamfered on the map; it is visibly not a mapping mistake. Though, building parts are less easy to understand for the average person without looking at a 3d renderer.)
As for the estimated height, I would in this case add est_height, est_min_height
est_height=*
and a fixme=height is estimated
(you should do this even if you do not add est_* tags; see also osm.wiki/Good_practice#Mark_estimations_with_fixme )

Regards,

Daniel

Seems I didn't switch back from Maxar to Bing, oops. I'm going to leave it as is for now as the difference is very small and all the roads in this area need to be aligned anyways.

Het staat er op de "Tag:highway=construction" wiki-pagina al langer bij, maar ik zag de link zelf alsnog over het hoofd bij het schrijven van mij reactie. Zie highway=construction
(en zie ook voor veel andere tags de wiki)

Overigens, er is nog een ander draadje als je nog verder wilt lezen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70803

Goed, blijkbaar kan er een jaartal bijgevoegd worden. Ik heb ook het forumdraadje bekeken.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63629

Normaal houd ik gebruik van de '6 maanden'-handregel aan, maar in Nederland zetten we er soms meer op dan dat. Bedankt voor het aanpassen.

Groet,

Daniel

Beste Hugo Woesthuis,

Veelgemaakte fout van nieuwe gebruikers die beginnen aan het taggen van construction op wegen; zorg je wel dat je er overal ook de "construction" tag op zet? Zo is de soort weg sneller terug te vinden voor andere mappers en data-gebruikers.

Groet,

Daniel

Hey eggie,

De straat staat momenteel in de BGT als voetpad aangegeven, net zoals het voetpad ernaast. Ook in Mapillary ziet het er niet veel anders uit.

Groet,

Daniel

Hey stephengmatthews,

I've added a building tag, since this is also a building.
changeset/111729302

Regards,

Daniel

See osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Hey vrynkevich,

Ways leading into a parking are highway=service
highway=service
They should not be tagged as (part of the) primary. See also
highway=*#Values

For other tags, see the wiki
osm.wiki/wiki/

Also, the service way crosses the sidewalk. It should be connected to (share a node with) the sidewalk.

Regards,

Daniel

Just fyi; select an object and press "Q", or right click on it and select 'Square' (square icon).
You can always look in the editor at the help menu in the right sidebar for shortcuts, or go to the wiki:
osm.wiki/ID/Shortcuts

Hey Gregory,

It seems you forgot to square this building.
In the future, please -continue to- square your buildings.
Otherwise, your edits look fine.

Have fun mapping!

Regards,

Daniel

-
Please continue discussion below, not in the fixme.

Regards,

Daniel
-

"und wo sind hier die Walnüsse sprich Häuser dazu ? ins Maps4BW nix zu sehen" - BeKri

"ergibt sich aus den Namen der Bewohner Dorfstraße 14, 14a und 14b." - strubbi77

Hey strubbi77,

Keep changeset discussion seperate, please; see
changeset/55734638

Regards,

Daniel

-
Removed discussion from fixme in
changeset/111488499

Hey BeKri,

Keep changeset discussion seperate, please; see
changeset/55734638

Regards,

Daniel

-
Removed discussion from fixme in
changeset/111488499

Beste Topo GPS,

Komen deze knooppuntenroutes van eigen kennis, of van o.a. Fietsknoop?

Groet,

Daniel

Hey strubbi77,

I have manually reverted your changes in changeset/111485206 as they are a violation of the contribution guidelines; the maps/data on triberg.de seems to be under an incompatible -copyright- license;
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ
(See also osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility for an unofficial list of compatible licenses)

Regards,

Daniel

Hey strubbi77,

I have manually reverted your changes in changeset/111485013 as they are a violation of "tagging for the renderer";
osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Regards,

Daniel

PS: The area is already sufficiently tagged.

Hey ChromeLotus,

You should check your mapping with and align to Mapbox or Maxar, as it is the best and most up-to-date imagery for this area.
Otherwise, your contributions look mostly ok, though way/945539413/history seems to be inaccurately mapped -the top right is part of the garden, walls could be more precise- and may be a composite of multiple buildings.
Be sure to zoom in enough to see everything clearly.

Have fun mapping!

Regards,

Daniel