Hey mackerski,

It seems you are changing the check_date based on aerial imagery. Or, are you doing a survey / using Mapillary as you are elsewhere?

I would suggest to not change construction objects based on aerial imagery unless you are sure they have changed (/make sure you add sources as appropriate, which I'm sure you do)
Imagery is ~1.5 year behind, which is useful for adding construction, but not for updating it.
check_date should be used for 'most recent' survey date, but it looks like 2024 mapillary is not uploaded here yet (may still be uploading); latest is from 2022.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey mackerski,

Thanks for the much needed improvements. You seem to be mapping based on the roof outline on regular Esri imagery. Note,
- Usually building outlines are aligned to their footprint. If aerial imagery is taken from the side the roof will be offset from the location of the building footprint.
- In the Kilkenny city area, Esri Clarity is usually better aligned to the 'true' location (and is generally almost top-down), than Bing/Esri.
In the rural area outside the road ring, regular Esri is best used.
- (It may be useful to check if the buildings are correctly placed based on existing buildings, but this is not true everywhere.);
In many places in Kilkenny, the buildings should be alright, some roads may still be inaccurate (last changed a decade ago). Buildings are mostly missing extensions from regular Esri (newer imagery) as you have already noticed.
Also, you may be aware Anne (b-unicycling) has been collecting imagery in march/april/..., some of which may not yet be available as it is still being processed by Mapillary.

I would suggest trying to align this set of houses on the south side (bottom-left) of The Sycamores to Esri Clarity. Elsewhere the difference between Esri Clarity and Esri is minimal.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Anfrageancg,

Bitte lesen Sie die text unter die Upload-knopf:
('unsere Bilder werden unter CC-BY-SA 4.0 veröffentlicht
Fotografieren Sie keine Personen oder Nummernschilder. Laden Sie keine Google Maps, Google Streetview oder andere urheberrechtlich geschützte Quellen hoch.')
"Your images will be published under CC-BY-SA 4.0
Do not photograph people nor license plates. Do not upload Google Maps, Google Streetview or other copyrighted sources."
Data von Google, etc. kann im OSM nicht hinzugefugt wurden. Auch nicht platz, details, etc. von Google.
Mann kann nur details von eigenen erfahrung (oder officielen website) hinzufugen.
Bei MapComplete kann mann dann die position immer besser darstellen mit die knopf unter die Fragen. Darfur konnen Sie die Bildern linksunter ('Bing', 'Esri', 'Mapbox', 'OpenAerialMap', etc.) nutzen. (da gibt Erlaubnis fur)

Sehe auch (EN):
osm.wiki/Google

Fur fragen
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/de/56

Discuss with the relevant mapper, or leave a map note, please.
way/292187915/history/1

Hey DaCor,

Try to describe changes, please. I.e.
'Corrected tagging for pharmacy'
tells other mappers more than 'fix'.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Also, I would recommend checking your changes with the official website for each POI and discussing it with other mappers -at least where you are not sure- (as the change is not just fixing an obvious typo; these two tags should not be confused with each other). If possible, submit improvements to NSI for larger brands (open an issue ticket)
https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index
(such as Superdrug)
and additional terms/translations to iD so a tag is more easily found
https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema
(See 'Translate!' link for translations)

Regards,

Daniel

Apparently it doesn't like it even with this few objects. Resort to checking objects below, it would still be quick.

Hey EyeHeartMaps,

Could you list the "county records" in your sources list when saving your edit(s), please?
It would be useful to know what you are refering to, just in case there are multiple versions or incompatible licenses.
(I am aware US governments generally have to publish in public domain.)

Regards,

Daniel

Fyi this changeset was carried out fully manually and because most objects would be obvious typos only, was done in a single changeset.

Changes can be found here
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=149242484

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I have reverted the modification of the name tag. The signage differs between segments of this road and is already properly tagged. You can check this by going into the editor, choosing on the right the button under the layer menu (data menu) and enabling Mapillary street level imagery.

Regards,

Daniel

changeset/149014425

Hey BrieQ,

I will again mention the POI details are already on the building in this case, so please change the building details instead if needed.

Regards,

Daniel

Hey BrieQ,

The details for Guineys are already present on the building;
way/332773284/history
The node you added looks mostly like a duplicate.
You should change the details on the building in this case.
(In most countries it is okay for either the building or a node to be used for the POI details); this may be inconsistent across the city.

Padmore and Barnes looks okay, assuming it still sells several completely different types of products in a single building (shoes and cameras).

Regards,

Daniel

Hey BrieQ,

What is your source for removing the note this POI may be permanently closed?

Also, please properly describe your changes in the changeset comment when saving, instead of solely using ambiguous hashtags. Changes could be additions, modifications or deletions to/of objects or certain details, where needed with explicit reason. This will help other mappers identify and verify your changes.
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=148971650

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I am changing the species tag you added to 'genus'.
changeset/149011719

As you can see from 'genus:en', it is actually a genus. A species is i.e. 'Fagus Sylvatica' (European Beech);
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q146149

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=145423979

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I am reverting again the addition of a noexit tag on a wall.
This time the noexit tag is already present on the road next to it, so no further changes are needed.
changeset/149011687

Your changes (full changeset)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144225721

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Dynamene,

I am reverting the addition of a noexit tag on the end node of a wall. It is redundant on non-routable ways.
changeset/149011665

If you still remember, what were you trying to add the noexit tag to, and why?
The road(s) next to it all seem to be fine as-is, including the one underneath the bridge.

Your changes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=144225721

Regards,

Daniel

Added in
changeset/148748984

Hey Anne,

Why did you tag this as settlement?

Regards,

Daniel

*ref:IE:smr of course

This changeset reverts
changeset/148270997

Hey Anne,

This was a temporary start/end-ramp for the motorway when it was under construction. It was constructed in segments, which are still tagged as such, i.e. to/from
node/1907545966
(Cashel - Cullahill -- Cullahill - Portlaoise);
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R639_road_(Ireland)#20th_and_21st_centuries

This changeset has been reverted by
changeset/148740347

Your changes
way/1257998131

Regards,

Daniel