Hey Lav_SN,

Check this object again, please.
You seem to have made the right decision in editing this object.
However, you have not removed the node, but you have moved it or used the square operation without checking the outcome. As such, you have created a redundant node in the building geometry.

Your edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127703513

Regards,

Daniel

Hey Mo_Nem,

Check this object again, please.
You seem to have made the right decision in editing this object.
However, you have not removed the node, but you have moved it or used the square operation without checking the outcome. As such, you have created a redundant node in the building geometry.

Your edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127704551

Regards,

Daniel

Hey KRIYA_Z,

Check this object again, please. Validate your edits with other imagery layers.
This building should be rectangular.

- The sharp angle you removed was caused by a node which was added by a different user than the one who created the building.
- On Esri Clarity, the roof has shadow falling on it from a nearby tree, however the ridges in the corners of the hipped roof are clearly visible. If you used a different imagery layers, you'd have seen that
- On Esri and Bing, the whole roof is visible and it is clearly rectangular. Maxar Premium is too blurry to see what shape it has.
- Also, you have not removed the node, but you have moved it or used the square operation without checking the outcome. As such, you have created a redundant node in the building geometry.

Your edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127709461

Regards,

Daniel

Corrected tags (copy-paste mistake)
changeset/127779901

It's so you know I've made changes to something you've contributed. This way we can give each other feedback and avoid edit conflicts.

This is to check the following
1) Does the fact there's an extension check out with your local knowledge? If not, you may let me know.
2) Does the mapped extension look ok? If not, you could make changes to it yourself and let me know.

A reply is appreciated, but otherwise you may ignore this comment.

way/942857209
Added an extension here
changeset/127574193

This building has been extended on its east end (the side which you mapped), see regular Esri or Maxar Premium.

(PS: Maxar currently may be more up-to-date than Esri depending on where you look.)

*Esri;PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 7.5cm (WMTS) latest

way/1100652420

Is this building finished yet, or is it still under construction?

Are the opening hours based on local knowledge / survey? We can't straight up copy from tripadvisor, google, etc. as you know.

Also, since it's a seasonal POI, I would suggest the following
- add "May-Sep: " to opening hours, this will specify 'only between these months' (last month included).
- remove seasonal=yes

I would suggest doing edits to boundaries seperately from edits to other objects (here: changed ref:settlement to ref:census2015).
This way other contributors can more easily see what changed.

Also, it may be beneficial to discuss changes in their import thread / github issue so it can be changed on all boundaries.

If it's owned by Shem's bar, I suggest changing it to be the operator instead of deleting the name.

Are you sure you wanted to remove the height and width of this one?

As for the name removals, I'd suggest changing the name into a description instead of removing it if you intended to do this.

What is this survey date for?

Feel free to comment on my changeset why you think it should be changed.

way/1100680873
Under the roof, I see
- there's a wall in the middle,
- on the left is a footway partially blocked by a fence and possibly an entrance, but it is obscured
- on the right is a glass wall, which I think is a glass room with four walls and therefore not a roof but a regular building part.
I could still see it being a roofed area without four walls, but then I don't know why there's an entrance in the glass wall.
node/10075880537/history

A picture of both sides would help, of course.

Switched the building outline and the 4-level part on the lower part here
changeset/127018311
(made it so the building relation makes sense)

addr:housename "Market Gate Apartments" sounds like a name or description.

Feel free to add footways to each one of them, but there's not really any need for it. ;-)

No problem

Also, when you revert someone's changes, could you link to the changeset where you did so, please? This makes it easier to track the changes for other contributors.

I added the turning circle because the alley is so narrow, and since there are cut corners which allows for making a three-point turn or similar there.

The gates are visible on Mapillary, or at least the large wooden one with the driveway.
I added the driveway since I can see what I assume is a white van in that backyard on Esri Clarity. Of course a backyard is usually a garden, not a driveway, but it does seem to be where they have their car.