Staat er een bord dat aangeeft dat dit stuk óók Grote Schoorsteenplein heet? Een voetpad heeft niet per sé altijd een naam.

Tip: Als je wilt kun je de capacity tag toevoegen aan charging stations om aan te geven hoeveel voertuigen hier kunnen opladen.
(Zie ook amenity=charging_station#Tags_to_use_in_combination )

Hier blijven tags staan die betrekking hebben op de autoweg.

Hey HarmHilvers,

Hier heb je de building tag van het gebouw afgehaald, waardoor het niet langer als gebouw gezien wordt.
Ook lijkt mij leisure=sports_hall beter passen:
leisure=sports_hall

Groeten,

Daniel

Bonjour ButterflyOfFire_,

Ce semble plus "storage tank":
man_made=storage_tank

Et, etez-vous certain que ca contien de l'eau?

--
This seems more like a storage tank.

And, are you sure it contains water? For storage tanks, you should only add the "content" tag if you can see what it contains from aerial imagery or with local knowledge.

Hey splith,

This edit looks fine. You can additionally add a way with highway=service + service=slipway (+ surface=concrete) which connects this node and the residential way, as mentioned here:
leisure=slipway

Hey spilth and welcome back,

When using iD, be careful. You may occasionally snap ways to each other which you didn't want to snap.
This node from the residential way was snapped to the Alabama/Georgia border:
node/52506134

You should consider using JOSM once you get the hang of editing:
osm.wiki/JOSM

Hey WJtW,

What is your source for height information?

--
Wat is de bron die je gebruikt voor hoogte-informatie?

Hey Jaap,

De A50 kruist de Kabeljauw, Utrechtseweg én Koninginnelaan ('Heelsumse beekdal') hier via ophoging als open brug ('viaduct'), gesteund op pilaren. Er is geen andere duidelijke verlaging/insnijding aanwezig.
(Volgens wikipedia:
"Een viaduct onderscheidt zich van een tunnel door de afwezigheid van natuurlijke elementen tussen de kruisende infrastructuur.")
Ik zou deze weg persoonlijk, al zeker op zichzelf, niet taggen als tunnel.

Wel mist er dergelijke tagging voor de Roggekamp onder de Rijksweg N225 door. Deze zou net zoals bij de Konninginnelaan onder de Rijksweg N225 wél getagd kunnen worden volgens mij.

Hey geozeisig,

"It may be tempting to tag building=* on any stationary aircraft, given the relatively poor renderer support for historic=aircraft areas. However, this is a stretch of the key's intended meaning that is often frowned upon because it causes some data consumers to make incorrect assumptions (see below). There is such a thing as an airplane house (analogous to a houseboat), so it is best to keep a clear distinction between these dwellings and other aircraft that happen to be stationary."
historic=aircraft

Change reverted in changeset/105576840

Original post by Marcus Jascher:
https://twitter.com/0xffff/status/1398941828188094466

Hey ACTtsocathe,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you have over 1000 changesets and have been mapping buildings at your own pace. I also see you have requested review in the past and have not received any feedback, unfortunately.

Head over to https://learnosm.org/en/ to learn more on mapping. It will help you map correctly.

Also, could you please reply to this comment?
It would be greatly appreciated.

Yes, this is the correct procedure.

I've neglected this fixme in the past because I was getting to grips with OSM editing. Right now this fixme is not high on my priority list either.
It is very easy to report issues with BAG viewer, you should try doing so yourself. This may also help you when working on other areas.
Note, buildings which are under construction or marked "(niet ingemeten)" can have wrong geometry but shouldn't need reporting. They will be correctly digitized eventually.

Hey Tilia,

Your changes to way/297435587/history do not seem to resolve my note. Sorry for not being more specific, there's a part on the south side which seem to differ from the BAG import (likely demolished). Also, since it's now a year later, it also seems like they built a new extension in its place, which faces a different direction.
Someone will have to make a re-import of the geometry, or report with BAG if this isn't yet reflected on their website.

Hey eggie,

Hier quote ik even Zr40 uit Discord:

Ik heb wel met JOSM de changesets van de vorige mapper heb gekeken
[...]
je kan in JOSM een URL plakken. In dit geval een changeset. Ik dacht dat je daarmee naar de betreffende locatie gaat, maar wat het doet is het object of de changeset opvragen van de server en toevoegen aan je data layer. Als je het gebied niet hebt gedownload dan ziet JOSM het vervolgens als een gewijzigd object

Groeten,

Daniel

Hey Hiausirg,

Fixed some minor issues from this changeset in
changeset/103110163
Mainly accidentally merging nodes.
Try to be careful when using iD.

Happy mapping.

Ok. However, "One feature, one element" applies here: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
A volcano or volcanic vent is in principle a geologically active lava flow and so is the lava field. Adding the same status tag -or a similar tag, which can be seen as tagfiddling- to the lava field area surrounding the volcanic vent node is considered bad practice.

Hey Morten Lange,

In my personal opinion, a status tag is not appropriate for areas such as volcanic lava fields.

Lava flow is active in the same sense water and mudflows (i.e. landslides) are active; they can be actively flowing -which is mostly passive, as it is caused by gravity which is an external force-. Parts of it may be active, others may not. This can change on very short timescales.
Also, almost no uses of the active=yes tag or similar tags are known -for this purpose-.
Furthermore, their size and any relevent features will be adjusted where needed regardless of status.

A volcano or volcanic vent can be active in the sense that it is (often) erupting. This changes on longer time scales.

Hey BubbaJuice,

Do not abuse hashtags in changesets, please. They are meant for linking changesets to a project the changeset is part of to make it easier to patrol changesets in said project.

Changesets such as this may also be considered as bot edits.

Hey there,

If you are unsure how to tag an object, please check osm.wiki/
You can also start learning OpenStreetMap at https://learnosm.org/ (some information may be outdated).

You have made numerous changesets where you have used incorrect tagging for residential areas and mapped places as areas instead of nodes. Also, you should not use capital letters when tagging unless adding a name.

Hey Dave,

Some suggestions:
way/801318694
Adding access=private and sport=tennis

way/698052937
Adding railway=signal_box

way/609346246
Removing description "More than just a pub Free WiFi". This is not a description; add this information as a note and remove said note if you have added the information. In this case, you have already tagged Free WiFi and there is currently no way to tag social activities held by e.g. a pub afaik. You can find these activities on the website.

way/545282062
Re-connecting this area to the water and adding a proper barrier tag. Alternatively, filling in the disconnected area with whatever was supposed to go there(?).

way/469679019
On Bing, this looks like grass with large trees and a couple of defined ponds, not a scrub. See also natural=scrub

way/396860741
Adding garden:type=arboretum
See garden:type=* and https://www.theparkstrust.com/our-work/great-linford-manor-park-heritage-fund-project/arboretum/

way/856060113
On Bing, this looks like a meadow, not farmland. See landuse=meadow

way/837856025
Private parking is not mapped as an area. This should be mapped as a way with highway=service, service=driveway and access=private on the center of the driveway.