PS: Es izveidoju problēmas ziņojumu GitHub repozitorijā, kas veltīts piena kannu statīvu kartēm. Vai varētu to, lūdzu, apskatīt? /
I opened an issue on the milk churn stand map GitHub repository. Could you take a look, please?

https://github.com/APizich/piena-galdi/issues/1

Angļu valodas teksts zemāk / English below

Sveiki, Vizma un Artūrs,

Esmu pievienojis aprakstu angļu valodā ar dažām detaļām.
Tāpat esmu mainījis materiālu no betona uz koksni. Platforma ir no koka, bet zem tās esošā caurule ir no betona.
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Lai gan esmu pārliecināts, ka to pievienot prezentācijas laikā konferencē „SotM Baltics 2026“ būs diezgan satraucoši.

Izmaiņas veiktas
changeset/184520715

Izmaiņas var redzēt vizuāli šeit:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184520715

Ar cieņu,

Daniel

---

Hey Vizma and Artūrs,

Added english description with some details.
Also changed the material from concrete to wood. The platform is wood, the culvert below it is concrete.
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

though I am sure it is nerves of adding this while presenting at SotM Baltics 2026.

Modified in
changeset/184520715

You can see changes visually at
https://osmcha.org/changesets/184520715

Regards,

Daniel

The remaining not:natural=wood are large multi-crown standalone trees which are easily mistaken for a forest/wood / multiple trees if solely based of aerial imagery. I'll personally keep them for now, though they exist in many places. However, feel free to remove them but with risk that armchair mappers will just add more trees where there are none.

The only noteable thing here is they support showing cars actually driving on the left since about a month
https://core.f4map.com/changelog
(the above may not contain all changes)

A derived list of supported tags is at
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/projects/f4

It does not seem relevant to this changeset though ;-)

Removed; newer imagery is available.
changeset/184274024

Merged it with the building in
changeset/184273398

Modified and updated with new ways
changeset/184269217

See changes visually at
- https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=184269217 ; or
- https://osmcha.org/changesets/184269217

If the name -be it english, gaelic, etc.- is no lnoger in common use, it is not used by OSM, except some old_name (or name:[year]) though this is better suited for OpeHistoricalMap.

It'd be better to consult the forums in any case.

It might be useful to read
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/transliterations-of-names-to-other-scripts-than-latin/144050
and join or create a discussion there
as I personally can not provide any further ideas on how to best use name:* in practice.

Note OSM preferably has only names in common use.
osm.wiki/Names#When_to_avoid_transliteration

as mentioned above there might, if at all, be only a single source actually using it for this place.
though it is somewhat unfair to small islands because they are relatively lesser known.
I am unsure how appropriate it is using transliteration from B(another place by an official body on gaelic place names) if using it from place A(someone's knowledge of gaelic) rather than common usage is not okay.
It might be best to wait until this official body actually has a transliteration for this place which can be used as verifiable source
that being said I haven't read into how actively it assigns names.

Hey jSeke,

I would suggest removing the gaelic name you added in
changeset/179773330

As you now know, gaelic names are not always the local/common name.

The only website which seems to be using this name seems to be Am Baile, but it is possible they are using an openstreetmap-based geocoder.
(geographic name search engine)
https://www.ambaile.org.uk/gd/asset/10544/

Though if you can find a verifiable, preferably local source for this name, it is of course welcome.
(and perhaps other spellings exist in gaellic which I am not aware of)

Regards,

Daniel

Hey EM_OSM,

way/1504170589
merged the two archaeological site areas.

You can see the changes at
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182884735

Guidelines
(these are guidelines, not set rules, they may be incomplete and there is room for interpretation, discussion and consensus with the local community and global forums)

- One feature, one OSM element
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

It is a single archaeological site, originally/historically and in common current name -eventhough bisected physically by road or other features-, unless otherwise noted in HEV/NIAH/...

- map features independently where they do not follow current/existing features)

except ie. in part residential landuse
landuse=residential#Separation_from_roads

use separate areas only if actually needed and prefer using a multipolygon or site relation (unless the only common/different detail is ownership, rather than type/ref)

Regards,

Daniel

I assume Inistioge Graveyard
relation/20706885
includes also this part of St Mary's?
way/1216922882

Hey CrS19,

I have changed the geometry and tags in this changeset. Archaeological sites have their own tags.
You can see the changes at
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=182786254
(copied wrong url, already fixed)

In iD, in the right sidebar, there is the Background layers menu (three layers) if you need more layers for reference. In the UK there is Digital Terrain Model (elevation) available.

For questions and discussion, join the local community at
https://openstreetmap.community/?map=55.440008,-1.597497&zoom=6

Happy mapping.

Regards,

Daniel

Modified in
changeset/182786254

Thanks

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!

Find the beginners' guide here
osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide

The relevant section for aerial imagery is here
osm.wiki/Pick_your_mapping_technique#Aerial_Imagery

Only east(right) of the river Barrow is Bing aerial imagery of good date and quality.
In this area, you should use the regular Esri aerial imagery for alignment.
Inside of Kilkenny ring road roughly, mostly Esri Clarity is used for alignment (but it is old, 2011!).
You can try aligning with existing geometry, though not all may be properly aligned as it was mapped in the previous decade when imagery was less available to OSM.
Keep in mind if you continue mapping you may need different offsets or no offset at all. You can also not easily save offsets between sessions.
Once you are comfortable with iD, you could switch to JOSM for more advanced editing features.

For questions or discussion, see
osm.wiki/Join_the_community#Communication

Contributors can comment on each others changesets to verify or request changes.
I would appreciate if you could reply to this message, please :-)

Happy mapping

Regards,

Daniel

If there is/will be a shop, could you link to where it mentions this please?
Otherwise, I assume 'shop' is a typo for 'workshop' in your last comment.

node/13770316846/history
Entrance is exit only based on red text sign, or handle positions, or ...?
There are at least two handles both outside on each door left/right, similar to main entrance.
Red text on sign is unclear from streetlevel imagery.

First comment about bus stop lifecycle prefix also remains.

node/13240842747

Changed entrance tag shop => yes
There is currently no (longer) a shop here, nor a workshop facility.
It is maybe still used as private shed, but not as workshop as far as I can see.