OpenStreetMap
danieldegroot2's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 157715970 | See also
|
|
| 166574769 | Hey GOduori, Do not reclassify highways without proper reason, please. This road is unlikely to be a secondary road.
It is not even possibly through-road.
From your changeset comment, this change was based solely on getting improper/missing result(s) from a query using overpass.
Incorrect result by such applications is usually an error in the query, or alternatively application, not directly in the map data. Changing map data in such way is considered 'Mapping for external application' and is prohibited by OSM guidelines;
Make sure to follow the (local) guidelines or concensus on for example tags for highways.
Be careful when changing highways, especially reclassifications but also roads with relations (i.e. bus routes, turn restrictions). Editing these without prior knowledge, especially with the basic iD editor, might accidentally introduce errors (moving nodes, disordering or breaking relations). It is better to make such advanced changes with more experience and JOSM editor.
Also, you should provide a proper description and reason of your changes in your changeset comment when saving (preferably for most if not all changesets), so other mappers can understand and validate your changes more easily.
For other helpful tips, see
If you have made any other changes which could be considered similarly incorrect, you should request them to be reverted by contacting the Data Working Group (DWG)
If you have any questions regarding how to contribute / map, you can contact your (local) community at
This changeset was fully reverted in
Your changes visualised
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 165910832 | Done. Oversight from drawing the full fence.
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 111985603 | It might be useful to add whether it accepts certain products yes or no, as indicated by the labels on the cabinet.
|
|
| 165977438 | Hei AndrisS, (angļu teksts zemāk) Nav atļauts izmantot Google Street View vai līdzīgus avotus, kuriem ir autortiesības/īpašumtiesības, kuriem ir noteikti izmantošanas ierobežojumi vai kuri (summējot) veido datubāzi (tīmekļa vietni/sarakstu/lapu). Skatīt šādas lapas
Ja citos jūsu veiktajos izmaiņu komplektos ir izmantoti šādi avoti, jums ir jāpieprasa tos atgriezt (atsaukt), sazinoties ar Datu darba grupu (DWG).
Turklāt pienācīgi aprakstiet veiktās izmaiņas. Tas atvieglo izmaiņu izpratni un pārbaudi.
Ja neesat pārliecināts, kuri avoti ir piemēroti, ja jums ir kādi jautājumi vai vēlaties citādi apspriest savus labojumus utt.
Vai jūs varētu atbildēt uz šo komentāru, lūdzu? Tas ir tāpēc, lai citi kartētāji zinātu, ka esat to izlasījis un saprotat. Translated with DeepL.com (free version) --- It is not allowed to use Google Street View or similar sources which are copyright / proprietary, have certain usage restrictions, or (when added up) form a database(website/list/sheet). See the following pages
If any other changesets you have made are using such source, you should request them to be reverted(rolled back) by contacting the Data Working Group (DWG).
Also, properly describe the changes you are making. This makes it easier to understand and verify changes.
If you are unsure what sources are okay, have any questions, or want to otherwise discuss your edits etc.
Could you reply to this comment, please? This is so other mappers know you have read and understand it. Regards, Daniel --- This changeset has been reverted in
Ref note/3726338 |
|
| 134762232 | node/8262678986
|
|
| 134762232 | Hey Michael, Be careful when validating/editing. node/10801169425/history
node/10801169424
Do not blindly trust the validator application(!)
If object is too close to something else then it might be better viewed with a different editor application / check if editor application has a way to do so, i.e. in iD press W for wireframe mode, or in iD/JOSM use data filters, or in 3D editor select level/layer.
Regards, Daniel |
|
| 111985603 | Image would be useful to confirm it is not the same as nearby public bookcase which has image suggesting it can also be used as give box.
|
|
| 165433740 | Some poems can serve as a memorial, but this one seems to be more of a poem which serves as (journey-based) artwork. I would suggest using instead
Also, the name is either some word(s) of the poem (usually first line), maybe somewhere mentioned in the book they wrote about this route, or no name ( in which case noname=yes ) For your information; it is part of a route and you are welcome to look for the other plaques and create a route relation (or site type relation, if you prefer, though it is mostly not supported) which includes every plaque (without a role). This route can then have a 'url' for example
|
|
| 165425779 | Hey BhavyaKhatri, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. If you would like to contribute to the OpenStreetMap project, there are a few ways to do so, see
If you would like to contribute to the iD editor, or similar applications, please read up on the Readme, Code of Conduct and Contributing files when they are available. They can be found on the GitHub repository, for example here
Contributing map data can help in understanding the project structure. If you need any help with mapping, you can contact your local community at
When testing application issues or your PR, it is important to test them locally, not on the live server. Such data does not belong in OpenStreetMap. See
Reverted this and earlier changesets in
|
|
| 118215755 | node/9561479152/history
|
|
| 150787859 | way/729909317/history
|
|
| 116905738 | Horse farm here is maybe the one to the north Another example, clearly horse farm
|
|
| 160684982 | Ok, I see, this is building part. Needs resurveying / changing building outline if it is already finished construction.
|
|
| 160684982 | node/12455844550/history
|
|
| 160684982 | It might also be useful to add dog=leashed to the segment between the two gates. |
|
| 160684982 | node/12456276754/history
|
|
| 116905738 | Ref note/679392 These are likely shelters/roofs for horses or similar?
|
|
| 144638172 | Ref note/4493019 By changing the building outlines to building parts, there is no longer any building outline. As such no building will be displayed by (most) rendering applications. Please resolve this as appropriate and comment on this changeset when you are done.
If you need any help, contact the local community at
|
|
| 58306975 | Hey crazed-mapper, In reference to
For private ways, you should use
Your changes visualised
Resolved in
|