And by the way, I think you are supposed to make the tunnel segments part of the Waterway too. I have done so for the segments north of Spangå.

According to the SDFI maps, only the part north of *Spangå* is called "Hove Å", and the part south of it is called "Vasbø Å".
Should I change it, or are you sure about the naming?

node/2660175840
I have changed Nældevads Å, such that it runs from the west and not from the south.

Jeg har vendt et antal af dine vandveje, der vendte i mærkelige retninger.

Jep, men ikke ideelt. Delt i tre changesets ville de f.eks. ikke besværre fynboerne.

Jeg er heller ikke særlig god til at holde dem kompakte, og visse datakilder er for besværlige til det.
Og vigtigere er det heller ikke. 🙂‍↕️

PS: God jul og godt nytår!🎄🎆

Hvis en sti slettes, vil den før eller senere blive "genopdaget", genbrugt og genoptegnet. Potentielt af den samme bruger, sågar.

Hvis du istedet markerer den med *access=private*, så kan man se at den ikke må bruges. (Jeg ved dog ikke hvor synligt det fremgår på kortene...)

Det kan også tænkes, at skiltningen inde i skoven er utilstrækkelig.

You made edits to Kolding, Nybøl and København in the same changeset...

I don't know what data you are dealing with, but it is generally best to keep changesets more compact, so they don't take up too much space on the history page.

osm.org/history

And he did it in India while editing Alaska...

OSM could use some feature to detect and split changesets covering extreme distances.

I've added somewhat precise fences all the way around Kulsbjerg Øvelsesplads. I feel like replacing the Area with a Multipolygon Relation.
Is there any other first-hand information you feel is missing from it?

According to
osm.wiki/Relation:waterway#Members
only water leaving the river and returning to it should be given the side_stream role.

And this tributary hadn't been given the side_stream role:
way/411049009/history

If you want to undo my edits, here is the changeset:
changeset/160256322

Thank you. 🙂
(And good to know that a changeset can be used directly to contact its editor.)

Can anybody see this comment?

I'm assuming it's a mistake that Lollikebæk has been set to flow northwards, and has changed it.