OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
137576451

You may have opposed the change, but there was an approved proposal for the change to emergency=water_rescue
osm.wiki/Proposal:Emergency=water_rescue

144424611

Thank you, I've opened note/4003342 just in case it gets forgotten about

144424411

Thank you, however Google StreetView MUST not be used as a source for any edits. Their terms are clear on that, so it is copyright violation. That change, at least, will need to be redacted.
note/3615142

144424611

Thank you, but now there are two number 44s next to each other, is that really how it is, or do the later numbers need changing too?

142888602

I don't know, why do you think it is?

144166597

Thank you for adding this, I have now added an area for the school and added some details to that as well.

144169053

I should have put in my changeset comment that I was checking https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ to fix postcodes.

This is well within TF9 3.. and the rest of TF9 2JQ is much further down the road, so it was a reasonable change based on that evidence. People and businesses frequently get postcodes wrong.

I have apparently misunderstood the accuracy of the NSUL data.

I can't say it's surprising that the OSM search shows this location for that postcode when this was the only object tagged with that postcode.

Also, your changeset comment is needlessly passive aggressive.

123909163

Sorry for the delay, there were some seemingly incorrect postcodes added here. I have now fixed them: changeset/144154120

119777268

The addition of the postcode was not me, but I have now fixed it

133927677

I wonder if this got matched with the wrong one?
The postcode and UPRN do not match this location

134018762

Hello, please see note/3988816 about Turkish Delight that you added here

144097005

Also fixed some postcodes which crept into this changeset, from NSUL

141416025

Hello

I was looking at https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ and found node/11199560490 which you added here

It isn't matching anything though: https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/progress/AB/#8/57.246/-2.720

And the Tomintoul PO there has a slightly different address.

Can you take a look?

143930561

Maybe they will respond to one of the notes, otherwise I guess it doesn't matter so much for now.

143930561

Do you think any of the tomb tags would fit here?

historic=tomb

Perhaps tomb=vault?

143750582

Actually note/3646698

143643725

Sorry, and remove a duplicate name, they were meant to be separate changesets

142856118

Hello, your edits are appreciated but please use comments that describe what you are changing and why. This edit had nothing to do with updating brands, as far as I can see.

I see that this is far from the first time that you have been asked this.

143308150

Postcode does not match the location for
node/11297570250

I'm finding these through https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ and the top ones are all post offices. If you have recent familiarity with PO data, then maybe you would be best to fix things

143027342

Another postcode error, maybe more problems as well