Thanks

Hi, thanks for adding the cafe. Can you double check the phone number though, it does not seem to be valid.
node/13793810348

This has been reverted in changeset/180779034

This has been reverted in changeset/180779034

I have reverted this vandalism in changeset/180778763

Ah apologies, I slipped up there. I've removed the incorrect number in the meantime

Thank you for noticing this and pointing it out, I had seen this error in a couple of other places and thought I had fixed all occurrences, apparently I missed this one.

Fixed in changeset/180586286

Hi, thanks for adding detail here, but you seem to have added several duplicate phone numbers that were already mapped using the contact: scheme
e.g. node/10553314712
way/266493096
etc.
Try to check for this, because there could be other places where conflicting data is added

Thank you for the feedback.

I feel like this sort of topic has been discussed many times before, of whether to have many individual changesets or fewer but limited in scope. My conclusion is that there are various suitable tools to analyse history which allow filtering by where edits are being made, by user and more and so having fewer changesets makes analysis of these bot edits easier.

The plan to have a maximum of one changeset per state per day was in the discussed proposal and no objections to that aspect were raised at the time. If you think there is something to add or a discussion to be had then please comment on the proposal thread or create a new topic in the forum.

I don't quite know what you mean there.

This edit only changed the phone value of node/3442248118 and did not change any other tags nor revert the phone tag to its previous value.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3442248118

Hi, thanks for updating these.
Should these two identical schools be merged into one object? From aerial imagery they appear to be separate, but perhaps your local knowledge can assist here?
way/1296800407
way/1296800406

PS, I removed the building tag from them as the whole site is not a building

I'm not quite sure which of the nodes edited here you are talking about, but it wasn't the bot that made it look like a regular business, but rather the original edit would have done that.

Tricky one.

I think we can be confident there is no 13, due to the other UPRNs being consecutive from 1 to 15.

In the council tax data, 15 and 16 have the same UPRN, so there's some error there.

There is only 54, 56 and 58 around here, although there have been known to be houses missing from the data.

I'll put a note here to be surveyed

Hi, thanks for adding Montreal Crepes et Dumplings Chinois
Do you want to double check the phone number though, it doesn't seem to have the right number of digits.
node/13537140449

The check data was based on the government data confirming that it exists rather than a site visit, in this instance

Was this comment meant to go on the note here?
I am not in the area to survey this

This is still marked as a tobacco shop, did you mean to change the category as well?

Hi, see note/5079443 are you sure this bridge exists?

Hi, thanks for adding extra details to Our Lady's Primary.

You accidentally set the whole area as a building, I've reverted that now.

Also, we prefer to map phone numbers in international format, but they get automatically fixed by a bot that I run.

And I don't know why you removed capacity, that is the legal capacity of the school, as per DfE: https://www.get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/135246
This is commonly mapped on schools.

Hi, are you saying that the library is not active? If so then we wouldn't really map it.

way/1459277814