Hi Rich,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for making an effort to verify the road data on OSM. Many US roads were imported over 15 years ago now, and might not have been changed since then, so there are many nonexistent roads. However, for private features, instead of deleting them we add the appropriate access tag. This way, someone else won't come through and add it without the proper access tags. You can read about it on the wiki here:
access=*

Happy mapping!

Hi, foot=yes and bicycle=no are implied already by footway. You can read about default access for different highway types here:

osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions

Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143429888

No problem. Happy to answer any other questions you might have. Welcome to OSM!

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143139207

You can press "Q" in iD to square corners of buildings!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143275549

Thanks for fixing this!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143330834

Hello sprrocket,
Welcome to OSM! The name tag should only be used when the feature is referred to that commonly - it's ok for objects not to have a name! You can read about it on the wiki: name=*

Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143395854

Hi menostiempo,
I am not sure if it makes sense to tag this with oneway:bicycle=no, even if that is how it is used. Legally, this is still one way (as silly as that is). Also, the cycleway is still tagged as oneway so this would incorrectly route cyclists onto the service road. I hope the city changes this in the future so this discussion isn't necessary :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143320824

Hi, did you mean to mark Highland Lakes Drive as secondary?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143325186

Welcome to OSM! I have corrected the location of the POI as well as the street name in the address (changed FM 18825 -> FM 1825)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143235133

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I have fixed the formatting of some of the tags and removed your description, since it is not intended to be an advertisement for your business.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I have fixed the formatting of some of the tags and removed your description, since it is not intended to be an advertisement for your business.

Looks good to me! Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143139579

Welcome to OSM! This edit looks good to me - in the future, you can split the way by selecting the node and pressing "X" to make two ways. Doing this allows you to change the tags on part of it while preserving the history of the way for future mappers to see. Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143026794

Hello 2feet,

I understand your concerns about the access restrictions for this trail. However, removing the trail is not a good solution - it's more likely for someone else to go and map it again, without the private property indication. Adding access=private will prevent apps like AllTrails and other users of OSM data from displaying this trail to end users. As such, I have added the trail back with access=private. I'm happy to explain more why it is improper to remove the data if you still have concerns!

Hi, tourism=apartment is not the right tag for apartment buildings. You can draw the building outline and tag it as building=apartments. This might not be possible from the Organic Maps app.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142635358

welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142675805

This is still a duplicate of the existing post office area. You can reply to these comments on openstreetmap.org and I would be happy to answer any questions you may have!

Hello, this is also a duplicate of the already tagged fuel station. Please don't create duplicates like this. The information should be added to the existing amenity=fuel area.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142592867

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/142601175