why are Shiloh Road and Tar Road access=no?

reverted

changeset/181597420

reverted

changeset/181597420

These aren't visible on the imagery you used, so is it safe to assume these don't exist yet?
If you are mapping proposed segments, please don't map them as highway=motorway + access=no.

This also breaks routing from NB I 474 to the actual motorway, because you put an access=no segment in the middle of it.

Are you on the citystrides forum?
https://community.citystrides.com/

While I don't use the software, I know that James is very active and helpful when it comes to fixing this sort of issue on his end. Since these were already access=private, they were tagged correctly. I encourage you to make a post on the CityStrides forum to figure out how this particular situation should be dealt with.

this was already mapped as access=private with a gate, and now you have removed the highway tag entirely. Could you maybe explain what you are trying to accomplish with these edits?

Can you explain why this specific section is a bridleway?

do these roads actually prohibit pedestrian access? foot=no is for legal restrictions

thanks for your response. I checked the Mapbox satellite layer, but I guess you may have more updated imagery sources than are available in the editor!

Hi Anton, since there's no physical separation between the lanes at this location this seems like the best way to represent this intersection. It also breaks routing for those trying to turn left out of the parking lot onto Wells Branch.

Hello, and welcome to OSM. I am reverting this edit because you dragged a lot of roads out of place - please be careful next time!

changeset/178434327

Thanks for your contribution. On OSM, we use the unabbreviated version of the name whenever possible ("Rd" should be "Road" in this case). I have fixed that for you. Otherwise, this looks good to me.

Happy mapping!

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. The wikipedia+wikidata are already mapped on the building relation ( relation/13704106 ) so adding it to the way is duplicating the information.

the stadium is mapped as a building relation, which you can read about on the wiki here:
osm.wiki/Relation:building

The wikipedia+wikidata should be removed from the way and stay on the relation.

Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping!

Hi Bizango,

You mapped this crossing little elm without any connections - you need to clarify that the path is on a different layer than Little Elm.

You can see an example of a similar trail I did previously here:
way/1205097045
adding layer=-1 and tunnel=yes to the parts of the way that are inside the culvert will fix the validator errors.

Let me know if you need help fixing this.

Welcome to OSM. The traffic signal there is correct - if you want to add an ALPR, please move it to the phyiscal location and map the direction. Let me know if you need help doing this!

Happy mapping

can you explain what you have added in this changeset, with a short comment? "dome"or "done" are not sufficient to help other editors understand what you are adding.

Welcome to OSM. Can you explain what you are trying to do in this edit, so we can help? Adding address tags to the road is probably not the way to do it

I reverted this edit. You replaced a nearby highway with a barrier. Please, do the built-in tutorial and try again. Additionally, google maps cannot be used as a source for edits to OSM.

changeset/175511189

reverted SEO vandalism

changeset/175168078

reverted SEO vandalism

changeset/175168078