citrula's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 145345089 | 'Welcome to OSM! This is not the place for personal, unverifiable information like this.
|
|
| 145340862 | You deleted a lot of tags in this edit which were not invalid. I fixed these and made sure that the website is updated as you intended.
|
|
| 145338531 | You can delete all of the tiger tags if you want. See the TIGER fixup page: osm.wiki/TIGER_fixup#When_to_remove_tiger:reviewed Only delete the tiger:reviewed tag when you have actually
|
|
| 145337424 | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution.
|
|
| 145314940 | You need to move the business to the proper location in addition to changing the address. |
|
| 145188021 | Parking spaces still need an amenity=parking around them. Refer to the wiki : amenity=parking_space
|
|
| 145262857 | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. Are you trying to map a house ? The way this is tagged currently is not correct. The wiki is a valuable resource, and I really recommend you check out the getting started page: osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide and the addresses page: osm.wiki/Addresses . Please let me know if you have any questions!
|
|
| 145225142 | Please write a changeset comment describing the edits you are making!
|
|
| 144972338 | Hello, I have reverted your changes following our previous discussions. If you are still interested in this project, I encourage you to post on the community forums ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ) for guidance on the best way to map features for urban riding. |
|
| 145172620 | I have reverted this changeset because of the aforementioned issues - If you are interested in historical railway mapping I encourage you to check out OHM ( https://www.openhistoricalmap.org ) and their recent discussions about a potential railway-centric layer ( https://forum.openhistoricalmap.org/t/what-should-a-rail-centric-ohm-layer-look-like/76/10 ) |
|
| 145172620 | I'm not sure that adding those railway=abandoned ways makes sense (part between 3rd and 4th street). It is not visible at all on aerial imagery. Also, why did you delete and recreate the Missouri Kansas Texas Railroad? |
|
| 145143472 | Hello, I made these changes to the POI because that is how addresses are formatted in OSM. I'm going to change them back, but I'm happy to answer any questions you might have
|
|
| 145129616 | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. You can press "Q" to square buildings in iD.
|
|
| 145123629 | Hi, did you mean to delete the buildings in the Landmark section?
|
|
| 145096838 | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. A couple of things I noticed:
Happy to answer any questions you may have. Happy mapping!
|
|
| 145002913 | Good catch!
|
|
| 144971078 | Hi FrontRangeUrbanEquestrians, there certainly is a lot of reading required to be able to understand everything that is going on - this is the nature of a collaborative project of this scale. I do agree with MxxCon that this sort of mapping is probably not fit for OSM proper, but there are tools based on OSM like uMap ( https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ ) which allow you to make layers for personal use that don't meet the "on the ground principle" described above. However, mapping the presence (or absence) of sidewalks and designated horse features is a great way to contribute towards your goal, I think. |
|
| 144980770 | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. residential=gated is not really a meaningful tag on road ways. You can map the gate (please see the wiki for more information: barrier=gate )
|
|
| 144975659 | Welcome to OSM! Thank you for making the effort to contribute and improve the map. You can press "Q" to square buildings in iD!
|
|
| 144325140 | Hello Mariam Riziq, I have reverted your changes since they are fictional and not verifiable - you are always welcome to contribute real information to the map and I would be happy to help you do that! |