Hi,

Can you please write more detailed changeset comments about what your changes are? Fixed logical issue on all changesets isn't very helpful when trying to look through history.

Thanks,
Phoebe

can you please add changeset comments in the future? thanks!

Thanks for noticing that! After doing a little research I must have accidetally added the wrong name as that relates to some form of music department. Should be fixed now.

Hi,

Just following up with this changeset, I assume its an accident but you tagged the tennis courts as recreation ground instead of the area around the courts. I've corrected this now but just wanted to reach out and let you know. If you need any further help or clarification feel free to reach out

Hi, thanks for pointing out those issues! Due to several similar quality issues both with the original data set and from the merging process this method of importing wasn't considered feasible. Sorry for missing those features during the clean up step. I've fixed the ones pointed out in those notes that already haven't been fixed.

Thanks for your feedback! Feel free to join the ongoing conversation here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/linz-building-import-new-methodology/134997/21 or in the OSM world Discord oceania channel

Hi,

OSM best practice is not to add personal information such as the names of people who own the parcel of land. The name field is for if the property or feature itself has a name, not the owner name.

For more information please see osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information

I've removed these names for you, please refain from adding personal information like this in the future.

thanks!

thanks for finding the surface=3 error! <3

eastern end isn't connected as it hasn't finished being mapped yet

I have no idea how surface 3 got there sorry, removed now in changeset/175468223

thanks for fixing up those school buildings! looks awesome

Hi, was wondering why you added construction to a residential area?

Hi,
Thanks for your comment! I've retagged these areas now.

Thank you,
Phoebe

hi, what was the source for this?

I've gone through the problematic area and added no exit tags to dead ends and split up the area, if the warning reappears can you please comment on this post. I hope it resolves it.

are you able to give more information about what exactly causes the "unconnected_open_ends_1" if known?

but yes I do agree there's probably something wrong with this particular one if its the only one appearing as an error so i'll go through and see if i can figure out what's wrong, maybe it needs splitting up?

I'm not sure why this particular one seems to be causing an issue compared to all the others so i'll go through it in JOSM and try see what is causing it, as for discussion around it refer to this similar fourm post https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/clarification-of-footway-area-mapping/130974/16 and this discussion on this changeset changeset/166883890#map=18/40.691542/-74.015139

For highway areas it is accepted and common practice to map them as both areas and ways despite the general OSM guidence of one feature one object. There's no approved singular tagging at the moment which is why i've used both of the most popular formats, so one can eventually be removed when a consensus is reached. It's important to not just map for the validator.

If there's a routing issue im happy to fix it but removing the highway tag doesn't seem like the proper solution