In the future, its best practice to reach out to the mapper before reverting changesets to come to a soultion.

What was the justification for reverting? I'm not aware of any local consensus requiring addresses on buildings instead of nodes, both are in common use. One feature one element does not apply in this situation as normally the address is for the land parcel not the building, unless different locally.

open to interpretation! I'm thinking about possibly changing it, but am unsure as it's kind of recognisable now

Not sure why that happened sorry, must have been a typo. I've removed it now, thanks for pointing it out!

Hi,

Southern Hospitality supplies cooking equipment and should not be tagged as a hospital
node/13778137206/history

Hi, I'm wondering if you meant to add this node or if it was a mistake?
node/12459781568
Thanks!

A few more of the stray untagged nodes, hopefully to help you figure out what's causing them

node/13763208533/
node/13763208555/
node/13763208552/
node/13741752482/

Adding on to this, I've noticed a few of your changesets seem to be leaving stray nodes such as node/13741752198/ but this may be related to the above issue.

Hi,

Are you able to clarify what the source of these thousands of buildings you've been adding each day is? Please follow osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines and clearly mark that these changesets are an import and link to the relevent wiki page in the future.

Thanks, Phoebe

Hi,

I have no problems with ducks=yes or ducks=intermittent. There doesn't seem to be an established tag so feel free to make your own as you have done here! Perhaps ducks=intermittent as so kindly suggested by Matt would fit better though.

Thanks,
Phoebe

Hi,

Can you please write more detailed changeset comments about what your changes are? Fixed logical issue on all changesets isn't very helpful when trying to look through history.

Thanks,
Phoebe

can you please add changeset comments in the future? thanks!

Thanks for noticing that! After doing a little research I must have accidetally added the wrong name as that relates to some form of music department. Should be fixed now.

Hi,

Just following up with this changeset, I assume its an accident but you tagged the tennis courts as recreation ground instead of the area around the courts. I've corrected this now but just wanted to reach out and let you know. If you need any further help or clarification feel free to reach out

Hi, thanks for pointing out those issues! Due to several similar quality issues both with the original data set and from the merging process this method of importing wasn't considered feasible. Sorry for missing those features during the clean up step. I've fixed the ones pointed out in those notes that already haven't been fixed.

Thanks for your feedback! Feel free to join the ongoing conversation here https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/linz-building-import-new-methodology/134997/21 or in the OSM world Discord oceania channel

Hi,

OSM best practice is not to add personal information such as the names of people who own the parcel of land. The name field is for if the property or feature itself has a name, not the owner name.

For more information please see osm.wiki/Mapping_private_information

I've removed these names for you, please refain from adding personal information like this in the future.

thanks!

thanks for finding the surface=3 error! <3

eastern end isn't connected as it hasn't finished being mapped yet

I have no idea how surface 3 got there sorry, removed now in changeset/175468223