## REVERTED CHANGESET

Duplicate of node/11987311699

Please be careful not to add information that already exists. I checked with my local copy of Organic Maps: this motorcycle shop was visible.

Hello,

Pardon me but there seem to be a few issues with this changeset again.

First, the "layer=1" tag you added on most buildings is unwanted. The "layer" concept in OSM is when objects are piled upon each other—e.g. a bridge above another road, or possibly a building partly above another one—but it makes no sense where objects do not overlap anything.

Some example here:
way/1488525617
way/1488525616
+ many more (you added 57 houses, most of them have this tag).

Most importantly, you added "ref:GB:uprn=10093769469" to most houses you added. As far as I can see, you copied an identical value to each building, as if you had blindly copied and pasted tags to every house you added.

This shouldn’t happen. We expect each house to have a different value, being its unique property reference number.

If you do not know what those tags are for, please do not add them, because by doing so you are corrupting data on OpenStreetMap.

OK, don’t bother, we have Mapillary picture of this area and it looks like a café. We moved it to its correct location and added the door.

Duplicate information. Reverted.

Please do not add municipalities or post codes on addresses.
We do not do this anymore in Belgium.
The entire country is already covered with areas to compute this data automatically. OSM is and should remain a well-ordered database.
Your edit has been undone.

You have just added a floating node with name=7Days but without any other attribute.

What is it? A shop?

## REVERTED CHANGESET
User dragged a node 195 metres further north, an obvious mistake.

Hello,

Thanks for your latest edits.

I know you certainly want to help but… I need to tell you. In Belgium, we do not repeat addresses on POI. We have made considerable efforts in the last years to keep our addressing system clean. Please do not add addresses on shops, this is not necessary and not wanted.

I repaired your latest edits, there is nothing more to do. But please bear this in mind for future edits.

Have a nice day.

way/212502530
Libary or Library?

Also, about this one.
way/212502532
A building for which "Shelter" is the official name? If, instead, shelter is the description of this structure, then it may be preferrable to change the building type itself (e.g. building=roof) instead of a name.

Hello,

You are probably unaware of existing mapping practices, so I will try to inform you here.

Buildings all over in Belgium are traced from official government data, one should not trace them from _aerial imagery_. Those images are nice but they are distorted and the distorsion changes every year, contrary to cadastral data, which gives the exact position. Please be kind and do not "correct" the shapes of buildings, because by doing so you are just applying an unwanted distorsion.
osm.wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Buildings

I see you are using the simple online editor from the osm.org website; it is possible to see the building outlines through the Background button → UrbAdm is the one within the Brussels Region.

I restored the correct shapes of the modified buildings along Lannoy.

The real changeset title should have been this: Fixed mistakes by changesets 179662050 179662005 179661977 179661917 (new user messed with building geometries, addresses and relations + user also broke a school polygon).

(The title from a previous changeset had been used by mistake, after inadvertently using UP and DOWN arrow keys in JOSM.)

Bedankt… mar "Hoogblokweg - Voetweg 50 (huidige naam Kerkstraat)" is geen geldige naam voor een weg.

Het is het een of het ander, maar men kan ze niet combineren.

Hello,

Please do NOT modify buildings.
If you want to add shops, cafés, etc. please create floating nodes inside the building.

I will revert your edit.

SVP ne pas toucher aux points d'adresses.

Pour ajouter des commerces : créez un point séparé à l’intérieur du bâtiment.

Je vais corriger vos éditions.

Hello, DavidXander,

This is another friendly attempt to reach you and try to get your attention.

In the past weeks some of us had to spend a lot of time repairing errors on the map after your edits. Can you please observe the following points.

On OSM, all "highway=pedestrian" structures must have a name. This tag is usually used for car-free streets. Some people use it for plazas near parks although it is a borderline case. You can (and should) use "noname=yes" for all those pedestrians areas you create when they have no name.

Also, please do not glue routable and non-routable objects together, e.g. this point intersects both areas: node/13633404181

I don’t want to discourage you, so I won’t give more examples.

Hope this helps.
Thanks in advance.

Next time, please do not destroy objects, retag them instead.
osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

We restored the former node for DK to preserve its history and make it possible to reuse it once a new activity opens here.
node/6789715631/history

Thanks.

Hello.

Here is a suggestion. If you write in the changeset description that you are adding GTFS stop_id tags, please only do that in the changeset.

In particular, do not click on the suggestions from the name-suggestion-index when it comes to public transport. Being an experienced user, you are probably aware that many of those "tag upgrade" suggestions are bogus. If I remember correctly what was discussed on the Belgian forum, there is a pending pull request or issue to update the NSI and stop it from uselessly adding "network=NMBS/SNCB" to route relations.

Thanks.

Hello,

Thanks for noticing that railway tracks have changed in this area. But I regret to inform you that this is a damaging edit. While changing the layout of the railway tracks you broke the continuity of railway relations.

I imagine you just just wanted to help. The simple online editor is unfortunately not a suitable tool to edit complicated structures, like route relations. I will try to repair this now.

Hello,

Can you please take some time to read the OpenStreetMap wiki, in particular this page.
osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings

In this edit, you created several invalid structures because you are piling up building parts without using building:min_level=*.

You might want to clean this up.

Thanks in advance.

Hello,

Thanks for your mapping efforts but I need to warn you because there is a problem here.

All the buildings in Belgium are traced on the official footprints provided by the regional governments. There is no such thing as "correcting the geometry" of a building from aerial imagery. If you do that, what you are actually doing is that you move good buildings away from their real location. Despite we have high-quality aerial imagery in Brussels, it is not a suitable source to trace buildings.

I will undo your latest changes in Brussels, when it comes to building geometries.

Thanks in advance and have a nice day.