Although the line might not be energised it is still present on the ground and I think it should be rendered. It looks odd to see a chain of pylons rendered with no line connecting them

Hi Mike - my edit didn't touch that tag - better to take it up with the actual editor. I'm actually indifferent about the issue

Regards

Brian

brainfart of epic proportion!

this is a designated public footpath so bicycle=yes is not correct

oops1 mre finger touble now fixed

oops! finger touble - now fixed

Hi Jerry

If you feel that is most appropriate then go ahead and change it. Your knowledge is superior to mine

Regards

Brian

deleted

Does this business really exist inside Waitrose? I shop there and haven't noticed it. I suspect this is the location you've copied from Google Maps. Also the address quoted doesn't exist so it can't be mapped accurately. One for deletion I'm afraid

No responsefrom you so changeset reverted

Please stop what you are doing until you know better. You have deleted a section of the River Corve and removed many relations that were were a result of a day's work. I shall probably revert this entire edit

Thanks Colin I'll take a look

Please be careful when editing relations: this changeset broke multiple relations which took a lot of fixing

Thanks for the suggestion but my tag was chosen precisely so that there were would be no render and also serve to deter anyone else from recovering the trees from outdated aerial imagery Tree stump not appropriate - not visible in the piles of wood/branches left after felling

No problems. Will do

No need I did this deliberately to save myself work in case the situation reverses if BCC decide to remove the popup cycle lane in the road which currently makes this shared cycle/footpath redundant and I have to reinstate it

Regards

Brian

please be careful with your sources one of your footpaths (way/722066183) goes straight through a building

You haven't kept boundary and landuse separate - you've deleted landuse. I've re-added landuse. This is an important landmark in the west midlands and needs to be shown as forest.

Because I don't have sufficient knowledge of pipeline topography to know where a section ref starts and finishes

Interested to know to source and licence for the data for the proposed road