Thanks for the contributions @tricalnikhil. Did the building get torn down, or just the business closed up shop? If the building is still there, the outline should remain and just the tagging should be changed.

Hi Mikala, there is a great feature in iD that will help you "square" the corners of buildings that you are drawing. Just right click on the line after you have finished it and select "Square". It looks like you are mostly drawing houses. You can tag each house as `building=house` to make them more than just a generic rectangle.

amenity=cafe should be used on businesses that are publicly accessible. we don't want to be sending someone down a residential road looking for a sandwich where none are to be had.

Something very strange happened to the shape of the "guest house". I tried to fix it up. Please check and see if correct now. (Also, it shouldn't be named "Guest House". Descriptions of things shouldn't be used as their name. There is a description tag that would be more appropriate.)

I read up on riverbanks on the wiki (waterway=riverbank) and think I have this correct now. Would you agree, @bp0410?

Oops. Did it again. Too quick on taking the default comments for the changeset. They really should say something about cleaning up self-intersecting ways, not about the river changes from my previous work.

It looks like a river should look to me. What feature isn't loading for you? Maybe you could take a screenshot and make it available somewhere.

Sorry about that. I missed cleaning up tags on the newly created inner polygons of the multipolygon. I've corrected that now. Does it look better? If not, please give me some details on what you believe is wrong with it.

Thanks @bp0410. I'll take a look.

Hi there @AKLAB. Thanks for all of your contributions. The area looks great. But you might want to know about a couple of problems with your landuse areas that you are creating. The first problem is that a way is not supposed to cross back onto itself. So when you are drawing a landuse area using a street like a cul de sac, you are going up the street and then using the same nodes going back down the street. This causes validation problems. Another problem is that you aren't supposed to connect an area to a way. The best way I've seen to create landuse=residential is to trace the sidewalks and not the center-line road way.

Two single-node ways and 8 nodes without tags that were all in the same location were removed in changeset/64587379

Hi @kbzimmer. Thanks for adding all of these new OSM features. One thing you should know is that outlines of buildings (ways) shouldn't cross over themselves. For example, way/635768307 kind of does a figure eight around some buildings that possibly meet at their corners. The outline should go around the entire outside of the building and not cross itself. You can see the difference in my change.
Also, I think that DigitalGlobe has newer imagery than Bing and a couple of these buildings no longer exist. You might want to switch to using the later satellite imagery.

Hello @meyer407. These nodes are all empty and part of a relationship that also includes a single-node way. I'm pretty sure this is in error and I've deleted the nodes, relationship and the way. If this was part of an ongoing project, let me know and I can revert my clean-up effort.

Go Bulldogs!

@jwbrett, it looks like you moved a node 1700ft and skewed a bunch of connected roads. Any chance you can go back and repair/revert it? The node is node/197740540

Hi @jpmartin1977. I don't know much about bus routes and how to map them, but I checked with others and they agreed that the EZRider relation isn't mapped correctly. If I'm not mistaken, you aren't suppose to draw an additional way, but instead add existing road ways into a relation. Sorry I can't be more help explaining the right way.

Why are there 8+ streams all in the same path?

Hello @Crete Greece.

You might want to be aware that convention states that you shouldn't put a description of a feature in the "name" of the OSM element. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for details.

Thanks for the contributions.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap Dick. Nice to have more people in Oregon doing mapping. I've made a couple of changes to your additions to follow OSM guidelines a little more. (If you don't agree with my changes, let me know or go ahead and revert them.)

The first thing I changed was getting rid of the abbreviations like "NE" and "St". You can read more here: osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

Then I converted the name_1 and name_2 keys to a semi-colon separated alt_name key as name_# keys are deprecated: osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Remove_suffixed_name-tags_from_wiki

I also tried to match up the names and alt_names with the connecting roads, but I'm not sure I did the right thing as I'm not local. The northern road is Lambert and the southern road is Cornelius. Are you local? If so, please tidy these up as you have more local knowledge.

Thanks again for the contributions and hope to see you again.

There is already a defined track road for part of these snowmobile gps-tracks(?). You shouldn't be adding a way where one already exists, should you?

FYI, the Bartlett River Trail you uploaded duplicated nodes (went all the way out and then doubled back along the same nodes). It also duplicated portions of the Lake Trail that you uploaded on the same day.