It looks like the 21st South Freeway bore the `name` "2100 South Freeway" for the whole length before user Sagei redid the entire thing last month in 100563396. Also it looks like they changed it from motorway to trunk? That edit didn't come across my radar when it happened, but, reviewing it now, it looks like a whole bunch of bad things. They deleted the history for the entire freeway, removed the real name and replaced it with the fakery you just removed, misapplied link tags, and changed it to trunk for no reason. It looks like TheConductor started fixing it up in 100872686.

Thanks for the feedback! I did some research and found that 200 N Fairgrounds Road is where they perform outpatient surgeries, so I added it as a clinic node with Castleview Hospital as the operator in changeset/102821951. I also learned more about how OSM tags healthcare centers, so I changed the urology-specialized "hospital" that user darognar3 created in the new buildings to a clinic node as well.

Hi,
Thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edit, as you requested, and I think it's mostly good. One mistake I found was that you added some building tags in weird places (like on the gas station relation), but those were a quick fix.
Happy mapping!

Hi,
Thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your 3 edits, as you requested, and I think they're good. I did change the Gosling Meadows neighborhood point that you added to an apartment complex area. The neighborhood tag is meant for more organic neighborhoods like "South End". You can read landuse=residential#Named_residential_areas for more information.

Hi,
In this edit, you deleted a whole bunch of perfectly valid ways, only to redraw some of them. This behavior is not appropriate as it deletes the history. Please see osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history for more information.

Hi,
The USGS topos are incorrect in this case, as they are often. The USGS maps are very old, although I don't think they were every correct in this location since they think the road went over rocks, and I don't see any traces of an old road besides the road bed that's currently visible.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I'm reviewing your edit, as you requested, but I'm not quite sure about it yet. Was this intersection reconstructed last summer? I didn't notice any disruption when I drove by a few weeks ago, but I could have missed it. As it was when the last aerial and street-level imagery was taken, Scribner and Huckins Roads don't meet the Parker Mountain Road at the same place, but are offset by more than 30 feet.

Yeah, to compare it to other roads in the region, it looks a lot like Route 9 through Henniker (osm.org/#map=13/43.1601/-71.8351) or Route 16 north of Rochester (osm.org/#map=14/43.4192/-71.0111). I support having it be trunk.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions in Northwood! Just letting you know that I reviewed your edit, as you requested.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap; thank you for your contributions! Can I ask what source you were using to get names for "Underpass" and "Cottonwood Drive" across I-15 from Red Cliffs? Is it something you saw going by?

Hi,
I reverted this changeset because this node was not "unnecessary", and was in fact the label point for Coos County.

From what I could gather from [their website](https://opentopomap.org/about), OpenTopoMap uses the SRTM dataset from the USGS/NASA, which was taken via satellite a couple of decades ago and has 1 arcsecond resolution. Of course, 1 arcsecond is not that great in this sort of terrain, but it's also the best global dataset that's in the public domain. I downloaded the tile for this area to take a look for myself, and the original data does blur the canyon walls in the Box pretty badly. There's nothing that can be done about that except convince NASA to release a dataset with higher resolution.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your edits in the Cockscomb area! As you have noted in some of your comments, the OpenTopoMap contour lines are too smooth to be of much use in this part of the world. We do have access to some USGS topographic maps, as well as aerial imagery. In the editor, if you click the button on the right that looks like three sheets stacked on each other, it opens a menu with a bunch of options for background layers. Of course, any one layer is imperfect, so it helps to compare a bunch and take the best attributes of each.

It looks like, before your contributions, the trails in this area were traced from one person's GPS recording. Since you seem to have visited the place, if you feel like a trail that's on the map does not exist, please feel free to remove it. Especially the ones that you tagged with trail_visibility=no. From what I can tell from doing research for this review, a lot of people go up the Box Trail, a lot of people go up the Yellow Rock Trail, a lot of people go up Hackberry Creek, and very few people go to the areas in between.

Sincerely,
aweech

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I'm afraid that a natural wood is not an address. There's an address preset in the editor that shows the relevant fields. I changed the point to that preset and started to fill it in, and you can add in the zip code and the house number. I assume that 9000 East is the street name and Gusher is the city name, but, if those aren't correct, you can change them to the correct values.

Hi,
I see that in this edit you changed a conservation area from a nature reserve to natural wood. This tagging scheme isn't great since it conflates conservation areas with tree cover, and this Quail Hill Conservation Area does have places within it that aren't covered by trees. You may have been confused by the many conservation areas across the state that are mistagged this way. This unfortunate situation is due to a long-ago import, and we are in the middle of cleaning it up. For more information, please see osm.wiki/New_Hampshire/Conservation_Clean_Up.

Thank you for your contributions

Hi,
The dangling sections you added are evaporation basins that have been completely cut-off from the main body of the lake. I'm not sure that these should be included in the lake relation? I went ahead and removed them from the relation and tagged them evaporation basin tags. I don't know whether they're skimming for salt or some other mineral there.

Hi,
As you're doing MapRoulette challenges, it's wise to pay attention to what you are doing. This reservoir was very clearly drained years ago, and so should have been tagged as natural=wetland. Also, its name is Ice Pond, not "California Brook Pond".

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your contributions. I'm reviewing your edits as you requested, but I'm unsure about connecting the New Boston Rail Trail to Mast Road like this. Last time I went by there (which was a while ago so things might have changed), the rail trail ended at a grassy area, and there was a barrier on the edge of Mast Road. Has this barrier been removed and the grass cut back then? Or do people have to walk through the grass and go around the barrier?

Hi,
I'm responding to your request for review. I spent a while thinking about what would be the best tag for this. I do sympathize with the thought of tagging this as unclassified, and it would be retagged as unclassified or tertiary if Weber County ever decided to reopen it. However, the road is currently closed to cars with no plans and no reason to reopen it, and, as the Wiki says, "Unclassified roads are considered usable by motor cars". I retagged the road as track, since it is common in the US for full, legal roads whose current use is recreational to be tagged that way. Tagging it as a path would also be perfectly valid. I also added in surface=asphalt, which was missing, and fixed the names of the Snowbasin roads, which had an incorrect space in them.

Thank you for your contributions,
aweech

Hi,
I see that you changed the operator on the Deerfield line from Eversource Energy to PSNH. Are you aware that the name PSNH was retired by Eversource years ago? If so, why did you change it to the old name?