Congrats on 10000 changesets! 🎉

Those are all lockers that require payment. There's a bank of either stands or racks there as well. I'll be back later to get capacity and their exact shape.

Hi, your imagery is several years out of date. Please remember to check more recent data.

Hi, I see that you tagged a bunch of asphalt sidewalks as cycleways. What is your source for this? There are absolutely no signs on the ground, and they are largely extremely narrow. In the local context, asphalt is used for temporary sidewalks.

Hi, please stop lying about doing surveys when you're clearly not, and please stop deleting good data and replacing it with rubbish.

Hi, do you happen to know when UDOT and the County put up the historical signs? I haven't seen them before, but also it's been a few months since I was in the area.

Hi just letting you know that I went by today on 126th South and construction hasn't started yet and the no trespassing signs are still up. Since you thought it would be done more than a week ago, I'll be improving it to match the current conditions until the project actually starts.

Great thank you! I was just confused since I didn't see anything when I went through the other day, but also I wasn't really paying attention. Have a good day!

Hi! Do you have any more information about when all of these median barriers were installed? And what the project's name was? I was there on Saturday, and I don't remember seeing them. Are they just smaller than the usual barrier?

Hi! I'm having a hard time finding info on the project that added these protected bike lanes on 400 North. Do you know what it was called?

Yes, it is impossible to use a standard u-lock with this parking. As best I can tell there isn't an established scheme for tagging which kinds of locks can be used with bicycle parking. If you know of one, I could switch it to that.

Hi, when did you survey this? Last I checked UDOT opened the bridge at the end of December, and I didn't hear in the news that it was demolished again.

Hi, Daybreak is like a fourth of the city. It has many neighborhoods within it and two distinct halves. It absolutely qualifies as a place=suburb.

Hi! Residential is best for streets that don't have much connective value and do have residences, and unclassified is best for streets that have minor connective value or don't have residences. I generally don't mess with residential vs unclassified in suburban areas like this, so for the mapping I did in Cache Valley yesterday I merely extended the unclassified classification so it doesn't end abruptly. To quote the Wiki "the principle of maintaining network connectivity should be maintained at each classification level".

Nope, I haven't seen any signs naming it that. But that's normal in Massachusetts. Very little is signed here. It looks like it's been called by that name in OSM since the import more than a decade ago.

Some of my family members visited the park recently and they said the lake is still drained. I haven't heard of any news on getting it repaired.

Hi,
Thank you for your edits! I see that you tagged the trails here with highway=track and motor_vehicle=no. Why did you choose to change it to this away from highway=path?

Hi,
Ah, interesting, I hadn't heard about the project and hadn't been that far west in the city in a few months. The highway=cycleway ways were added by a new mapper and suspiciously was drawn exactly on top of the painted lanes, and I erred on the side of caution. There really wasn't much history to delete since it was created the day before (besides the one older way that got picked up by my editor's splitter).

The places where there has been long-standing physical separation are already tagged with cycleway=track. For such short stretches, it makes far more sense to use that tag than an independent highway=cycleway way like is used for the Commercial Street cycle track.

Once the project is finished, we absolutely should model the new protection with highway=cycleway ways or the cycleway=track tag (though it'd be hard to use highway=cycleway ways without aerial imagery).

Hi,
I see that you have been modeling bike lanes as new ways tagged with `highway=cycleway`. In OpenStreetMap, we map unprotected bike lanes like those much of this part of on Comm Ave by adding cycleway=lane to the roadway. Otherwise routers will rank dangerous roads like this far more highly than they should. Nearly all of the existing bicycle lanes in Boston and Cambridge are already mapped, but we could use help mapping bike parking. Please see osm.wiki/Bicycle for more information on tagging bike lanes.

Hi,
I reviewed your edit as you requested. I agree that Mass Ave should be primary through Cambridge and Boston all the way to Columbia.