Snyggt, som vanligt!!

Thank you for checking for further possible errors! As I wrote earlier I stumbled over this by pure accident as I was about to set name-tag to the soccer fields and kindergarten. I did not actively keep an eye on your edits. Would be nice to hear from you, that this incedent was the only one of its kind.

ok, thanks. My second comment was sent before I had the chance of reading your explanation.
Thanks for checking for any further errors! That's a relief!
I have som resentment of part of your language. "but thanks for keeping an eye, we really appreciate the community involvement" sounds as though openstreetmap is mainly managed by Microsoft and then there are those who belong to the community at the sideline, and who sometimes deserves thanks for their commitment.
By this comment - a Freudian slip - you have revealed what you think of those who work for free with openstreetmap.

The thing is, I stumbled upon this (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130599571) by accident. This is not a tiny stretch of road mistakenly inserted, but rather an autostrada. And the information is given to us that this "new" highway is founded on "survey"!
So I wonder if and how many new Microsoft fantasy roads were made in Sweden under the latest months. cs-comments were given as to "adding of names", but this is aparently not true.
So good folks, check if you got some new Microsoft fanatsy road in your neighbourhood.

This steet (way/1125396916/history) don't exist! Your imaginary street streches over established soccer-fields and over several buildings.
Your comment to this cs is about adding missing names. But this is not truefull at all. You have created this fantasy street (according to node-history of street you are the only editor of this street).
As you have done a lot of editing in Sweden, I wonder, how many streets like this did you insert in osm?
This inserting a fantasy street and commenting as adding name to an existing street is a bit like vandalism, isn't it?
Does this represent Microsoft Open Maps quality?

Fifth case:
way/1096209044

I am sorry to inform you about the forth (4) case wher you should have inserted a bridge (correctly) instead of a culvert (wrongly): way/1098476524.

Just for the record and if you should wonder; here are the two (2) other cases where you should hade inserted a bridge instead of a culvert:
way/1098207312/history
way/1097984191/history
As you have guessed so wrongly now at least three (3) times, it might be better to keep the water/highway-conflict untill someone w local knowledge will fix it. Otherwise risk is that this sort of faulty edits will be undetected for quite some time. This of course does get into conflict with your employers wish to get rid of these kind of conflicts in order to get proper routing.

Hej, this is the third case where you inserted av culvert instead of - correctly - inserting a bridge instead. I think you have done a bit too many guessworking here.
Other mappers should check in regions known to them if there are more cases as these. This overpass query should be of assistence to them: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pQ3

Jag skulle vilja be dig om att låta bli att tagga om helt korrekt taggade gc-vägar. Jag har reverterat din cs.

Vänligen skriv en kommentar om vad du har gjort i din changeset, tack.

Hej,
Varför lägger du in en nod med ICA Grytan på en byggnad som redan är taggad som ICA Grytan? Var vänlig ta bort din edit, tack!

Hej,
Just nu hamnar allt du editerar på fel ställe.
Du måste justera bildbakgrunden först för att få det rätt. Satellitbilden är inte rätt per se utan har en viss offset (olika beroende på vilken bakgrund).
Här förklaras hur du gör för att justera:
osm.wiki/Using_aerial_imagery

Varför lade du till en nod med Ica City Fristad i en byggnad som redan är taggad med - korrekt namn - ICA City Fristad? Du måste ju ha sett att ICA-affären redan finns.

Hej,
jag har rullat tillbaka det här cs där du bytte fr addr:city till addr:district. Taggen addr:district tillämpas inte i hela norden (skandinavien) och skulle ställa till med problem. Den avser enl wikin något slags administrativ enhet som inte är aktuell i Sverige. Här är det fråga om rena postadresser.
Innan du byter taggar som i det här fallet, kolla alltid först om det är lämpligt och vad som tillämpas på stället. Tack!

Ja, något i den stilen måste ha hänt vid editeringen. Har tagit bort adressen nu.

Gott Nytt År på dig också!

Förresten; kolla här - en sittbänk med adress: node/1673878906 !!

Ah, jag läste i wikin att det är så man skall göra (så som du har gjort). OK Tack!

Varför addr:country=SE? Detta är en standadiserad förkortning. Bör det inte vara "Sverige" istället?

Ok, då är både t/r rutterna borta.