hi, welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edit.

I tweaked the tags here to be more consistent with how this is typically mapped and tagged.

Did you survey https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/288436548 ? From all the imagery it is still appearing.

FYI I think way/948639252 usually would be mapped tertiary_link, open for discussion if these should be or not, but it's what's commonly done.

I removed the ford=yes because you can't know if it's a ford or there is a bridge here from imagery, best to leave untagged so it can be set once surveyed.

Hi, could I also check why foot=yes was removed? Do you know if foot access is permitted here? Best to have it explicitly tagged yes or no.

Hi just checking why access tags were removed? For highway=track, it's a good idea to explicitly tag motor_vehicle, bicycle and foot access.

Oh I see, thanks. so your edit was correct. I re-deleted this one now. Because your changeset comment mentioned crossing water bodies I didn't realise you'd removed this because it was duplicate, sorry.

I've reverted changeset/105388046 which should have restored these now.

reverted in changeset/105384291 ways are on different levels so shouldn't share a common node

I don't see the issue with layer=0 here, it's making it clear someone with knowledge knew this as ground level, or at least level 0 relative to other layer tags. Without it you don't know where you've checked and where you haven't.

reverted in changeset/105384967

how do you know this is really a building passage? It's too hard to tell from the imagery so I'll revert. Please don't just blindly "fix" iD warnings, mostly they need a survey to check what the issue is, is it the road not tagged correctly, the road in the wrong location, the building in the wrong location?

reverted in changeset/105384852 it's impossible to tell from Maxar if this is a bridge or not

reverted in changeset/105388046 due to deletion of valid area:highway=* tags

the original intent here was more likely to have steps, so I've reverted and removed the overlapping path

not sure why this building was deleted, re-instated in changeset/105452223

I reverted this because it doesn't make sense to have a slipway at the end of a pier, and from the imagery the piers are next to the slipway.
I did a second changeset to update based on imagery.

looks like you've reinstated this, thanks.

If the path leads to the shelter, then it should connect, so I've reconnected.

reverted in changeset/105460438