looks like you've accidentally dragged the address node here

Neither is wrong, just different styles, in fact I would say how you had it before is better, but still either way is acceptable.

Sounds good thanks for confirming. There's probably different opinions on what's trail_visibility=no and what's trail_visibility=horrible, for me it's generally no being completely off-track and horrible being some evidence of a path but frequently disappears. I'll trust your best judgement, it's more important to have no/horrible than none at all and someone things it's a well marked out track.

Yeah I saw your edits adding route=canyoning, good to see someone interesting in improving OSM in this aspect.

See also natural=gorge you can use to mark the natural canyon feature (if it's a wet canyon then the tag would be on the same way as waterway=stream). I've done it for a dry canyon at way/732287179

Eventually I start including natural=gorge tags on my maps for beyondtracks.com so would be nice to see more of these tags added.

route=canyoning normally would go on the relation not the way at least following osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Canyoning but I'm not going to complain about it going on the way itself, it's not harmful and can always be converted to a relation later.

I hope you're not copying Tom's maps but instead using your own surveyed data since his maps are copyright, that said he does edit here sometimes, but you'd need to check and make sure he's happy to license it for use by OpenStreetMap.

Hi I see you've added trail_visibility=no, that usually only applies when there is no path at all is that the case here?

reading some forums seems like plenty of people just ignored the sign and ride here anyway, but also looks like it's within the last few years it changed. Either way I've updated it now, but we should try and check some of the other ones you've added here.

The Cowan Track is signposted as walkers only so I've removed your mtb route relation.

Also the Maxar Premium/Standard imagery appear to have the newly constructed roads like the ESRI Satellite. The Maxar Bushfire imagery has them partly constructed, so agree there is enough here to map out the bridges in construction.

I didn't hear back from you so I've reverted this change since I can't confirm from street level imagery or other sources, please write back if I'm wrong.

same thing here, I've reinstated the dropped tags in changeset/82873200

hi there were a few tags you missed when converting the node to a way so I've added them back in now in changeset/82873099

reverted in changeset/82767731

I know this is a year old, but per level=* the level tag is used to mark levels of a building, not as a generic layer sorting (that's osm.wiki/Tag:layer=) or to indicate over/under ground (that's osm.wiki/Tag:location=).

Regardless it looks like in this changeset you've done a select all in JOSM and applied the level=-1 tag. That resulted in every node also getting level=-1 which isn't needed, even if this was indicating layer sorting.

With that in mind I'll revert these changes, but please do post back with what the intention was and if there's still an issue.

I've reinstated the name tag in changeset/82767616

I've reinstated the name tag in changeset/82767616

I've reinstated the name tag in changeset/82767616

reverted as seo spam osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

reverted as seo spam osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

FYI none of the tolled motorways in Sydney have toll_boths, we only have highway=toll_gantry

Part from that I can't see any evidence of a tolling point here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3xy7fpSoBqWDFVz1SnTHvQ&focus=photo, has one since been installed?

hi! highway=construction is used where the track is under construction or undergoing major repair work, is that the case or is it just closed for access due to landslide risk?

Hi I see you removed https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/585994923 and added dual carriage ways.

1. Where possible if you could try to reuse existing ways that's helpful to retain the history. So you could convert that existing way to one of the carriage ways and then create a new one. I know this isn't always easy so it's not a rule, just nice to do if possible.
2. Ways generally are only mapped as each direction if there is a physical barrier separating them. In this case from the imagery and at https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SGbQF7N5A9y6aVj9HOVIqA I can't see any barrier, if you surveyed recently did you notice any new separation? If not then it should usually be mapped as a single way.